Westmclaren
Only warning before you are blocked
editDo not call editors "sick" or spammers when they are simply removing improperly sourced additions. To be clear, if this happens again, you will be blocked without further warning. This is not the Ukrainian Wikipedia, we have our own rules. At this point, your editing has been nothing but disruptive. You need to familiarize yourself with our policies. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- I predict a block for edit warring is imminent. Drmies (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Westmclaren (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I made a contribution. I did not break anything. It is always easier to block someone, remove someone. And when I asked for help, I became guilty. It's sad. Westmclaren
Decline reason:
Talk page access revoked. Your disruption, personal attacks, edit warring, refusal to seek consensus, and your general confrontational approach (which extends across multiple Wikipedias) make it clear that unblocking you would be a bad choice. If you wish to make another appeal, please see WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Westmclaren (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #19982 was submitted on Dec 07, 2017 19:40:06. This review is now closed.