Whitecatger

Your submission at Articles for creation: Halcon (Software) (August 22)

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Halcon (Software) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 02:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Flat Out, and thanks a lot for reviewing my article about Halcon (Software)! You state "There are insufficient sources that relate directly to the subject" - and I am wondering: keeping in mind I quoted the most important professional journal there is in English language about Machine Vision, as well as the very few standard reference books there are about machine vision software, and the worldwide ONLY blog about this topic, and all of them write about HALCON and its applications - what else should I quote? Publications in other languages maybe?

Being a small niche, there is not too much literature about this topic. However, as it is very scientific, the literature which is out there is also written by real experts and thus, in my opinion, in a very high publication quality.

I totally understand that a topic has to be notable to be listed in Wikipedia. Also understanding how many industrial applications are depending on and running with HALCON (including the NASA Robonaut) in a lot of economical sectors (incl. semiconductor industry, agribusiness, food industry, automotive or medicine), I think it is quite notable indeed.

Please let me know your suggestions what I could change about the references. Maybe you could give me 1 or 2 concrete examples why my references are insufficient? That would be great! Thanks a lot for your help!

--Whitecatger (talk) 07:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic