July 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Alexandre Coste has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jeffrey Mall | Talk2Me | BNosey - 14:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Albert II, Prince of Monaco. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. WuhWuzDat 14:34, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

In your edit summaries here, you make allusions to possible violations of french laws by altering your edits. As Wikipedia is in no way subject to french laws, these "warnings" are totally inappropriate. 14:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


The fact is Alexandre Coste was born in France and acknowledged under the French law by his parents. According to the French and Monegasque laws, his parentage is governed by the French law. So, in order to inform honestly the readers, Wikipedia cannot write about this child's parentage without mentionning this.

The law has the power of a judgment. France has concluded bilateral agreement for recognition of judgment with Monaco (the treaty on judicial cooperation between France and Monaco of september 21, 1949). This agreement gives judgments within their coverage effect without exequatur if certain coditions are fulfilled. The conditions include the usual requirements of juridiction in the court of rendition, due notice to the defendant, and absence of violation of public policy. In application of this treaty, the articles 310 and 311-14 of the French civil code are executory in Monaco.


Article 310 of the French Civil Code : "All children whose parentage is lawfully established have the same rights and the same duties in their relations with their father and mother. They enter into the family of each of them."


Article 311-14 of the French Civil Code : "Parentage is governed by the personal law of the mother on the day of the child's birth; where the mother is unknown, by the child's personal law."


Treaty on judicial cooperation between France and Monaco of september 21, 1949 :

Article 18 : "Executory judgments and awards in one of the two countries will be declared executory in the other by the court of the first authority of the place where the execution must be continued."

Article 19 : "Notarial acts and official reports of conciliation, executory in one of the two countries, will be declared executory in the other by the chair county court of the place where the execution must be continued."


The Monegasque law also has changed. It provides that a child born out of wedlock can be legitimized in two ways : by the subsequent marriage of his father and mother (article 226-10 of the Monegasque civil code), or by the legal establishment of his parentage with regard to his two authors (article 226-9 of the Monegasque civil code).

Article 226-10 of the Monegasque civil code :

"The legitimization of the child automatically intervenes by the subsequent marriage of his father and mother if, out of the marriage's celebration, the child's parentage is already established. If it's not already established, the child must be acknowledged at the time of the marriage. In this case, the civil act officer which proceeds to the celebration notes the acknowledgment and the legitimization by a separate act."

Article 226-9 of the Monegasque civil code : "The legitimization can benefit to all children born out of wedlock provided that, by a voluntary acknowledgment or by a court judgment, their parentage has been lawfully established with regard to their two authors."


Alexandre Eric and Jazmin Grace parentages are lawfully established with regard to their two authors, they are thus direct and legitimate Prince's Albert's children. They cannot be excluded by the article 10 of the Monegasque constitution (the Princely law n° 1249 of April 2, 2002) which provides that : "The succession to the Throne, opened by the death or the abdication, takes place among the direct and legitimate descent of the reigning Prince, by order of primogeniture with male priority to the same degree of kinship..."


Wikipedia wrote this : "Alexandre would become Monaco's heir apparent under current law if Albert were to marry Eric's mother in a legal marriage. But in a 2005 exchange with U.S. interviewer Larry King, Albert stated that this will not happen." The claim that Prince Albert said in the Larry King's interview that he will not marry Alexandre Coste's mother is absolutely wrong. Prince Albert never said this.


Wikipedia can accuse me unfairly and block my editor's account, it doesn't matter because it's not important for me. I will express myself elsewhere.

The real motivation of people who claim unfairly that under the Monegasque law, children born out of wedlock can only be legitimized by the marriage of their parents, is to draw Alexandre Eric and Jazmin Grace aside of the throne. The most important thing I have to do, as someone who knows that this claim is not true, is to inform the public of the reality of the Monegasque law.


Quote from Mohandas Gandhi : "There is a higher court than courts of justice and that is the court of conscience. It supercedes all other courts."


Alexandre Eric and Jazmin Grace, Monegasques love you. VIVA A MUNEGU.

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wickkki for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. WuhWuzDat 18:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply