Wiggins2
Talk page
Suspected is an understatement. Jason, are you really that dim, or are you so arrogant as to think no one would snag you? Go ahead, report this a a personal attack. Please. Jim62sch 01:14, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Yes, suspected is an understatement. Wiggie, I would advise you to admit that you are Jason. You virtually did so on my talk page already. AvB ÷ talk 15:15, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Wiki 4 Christ Spam
editAfter discussion on WP:AN/I in which there was broad support for a block for your disruptive activities with respect to various AfD discussions, I'm blocking you for 48 hours. You may be blocked again if you resume disruptive activities. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 01:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
We started a proposal Wikipedia:Wikiethics to state the existing policies coherently and make suggestions on improving the editorial standards in Wiki. I thought you might be interested in contributing to that proposal.
Unfortunately, a pro-porn and pro-offense lobby is trying to make this proposal a failure. They unilaterally started an approval poll although almost no one including me believe that it is time for a vote, simply because the policy is not ready. It is not even written completely.
Editors who thinks that the policy needs to be improved rather than killed by an unfair poll at the beginning of the proposal, started another poll ('Do we really need a poll at this stage?') at the same time. The poll is vandalized for a while but it is stable now. A NO vote on this ('Do we really need a poll now?') poll will strengthen the position of the editors who are willing to improve the ethics policy further.
If you have concerns about the ethics and editorial standards in Wiki, please visit the page Wikipedia:Wikiethics with your suggestions on the policy. We have two subpages: Arguments and Sections. You might want to consider reviewing these pages as well...
Thanks in advance. Resid Gulerdem 01:01, 23 March 2006 (UTC)