edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph of Anchieta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles V. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. An edit you recently made to Ken Follett seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Forbes "Source is reliable"

edit

Please read WP:FORBES. Consensus indicates that

Most content on Forbes.com is written by contributors or "Senior Contributors" with minimal editorial oversight, and is generally unreliable. Editors show consensus for treating Forbes.com contributor articles as self-published sources, unless the article was written by a subject-matter expert.

Per WP:BDP, BLP rules still apply to the recently deceased, and BLP strictly prohibits the use of self-published sources on BLP articles. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I wasn't aware of that. Wigly Pigly (talk) 03:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)Reply