Haiti? or Werley Nortreus?

edit

You would be more effective if you were more of a team player. Of course this is an important event, as important as ND burning in Paris. But that does not mean you should be just taking images off the internet to illustrate the page... nor should you be using sources like https://www.die-tagespost.de/gesellschaft/aus-aller-welt/ein-zeugnis-der-geschichte;art309,207863 & http://gnnliberia.com/2020/04/23/royal-chapel-of-milot-monument-destroyed-by-fire-said-haiti-officials/ when much better sources exist... especially not to take copyright photos from their serialized content publication.

Why have you alluded to the same uninteresting citation from Werley Nortreus in this article twice? Were you the original author of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Werley_Nortreus&action=edit&redlink=1 back in 2013?

I would like to believe your primary concern is Haiti and not Werley Nortreus.-- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 04:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. El_C 05:19, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


Thanks for warning editors about the dispute. I didn't dispute and I have fixed everything that other editors have found wrong because I know dispute with other editors is a violation. As a matter of fact, I hope other editors follow the rules as well. Thanks! ````
That response doesn't make much sense. Please observe our policies and guidelines, including ones pertaining to edit warring and copyright infringement. El_C 05:28, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you and I will look at it.

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 05:32, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiCreators20 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked while I was fixing issues in a wikipedia article that I wrote while I had a dispute with other editors even when I fixed the issues they have found wrong. I deserve to be unblocked because I read the policies and guidelines and I understand the reasons.

Decline reason:

Yes, you've said that in talk pages before, but your actions suggest otherwise. You seem to believe that as long as you believe you are "right," you can ignore others' feedback.OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:35, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My opinion on this

edit

I did not ignore others suggestions, I listen to everyone. Like I said before, they blocked me while I was fixing issues they have found wrong. The way they did it, it's like the article gotta go their way and how they wanted it to be. They didn't even want to listen to my opinions. Why block when we can learn and fix things together? WikiCreators20 (talk) 18:51, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply