Yo, this is WikiDragon, I don't mind if you ask me to help you debate with someone, but I'd rather you not, but if you do, then remember, I will not always enter the debate, but if I do, then I will not always take your side in the debate. See ya later.

¥→WikiDragon295 00:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dude, we get that you are a reborn Christian (my compassion, btw). How many userboxes do you need to state that :-) ? Malc82 22:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your complaint on the village pump

edit

The village pump isn't really the place for your complaint. An isolated act of vandalism isn't something you get blocked for, it' something you get warned about. Repeated offenses might lead to blocking, but User:Nikro doesn't seem like a blatant vandal (I'm really not sure what he was thinking), I will warn him to resist the temptation in the future and I expect that will be the end of it. --barneca (talk) 22:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Set up

edit
This is a copy from the my talkpage.

Nikro Vandilised my user page, i say he should be banned.

These edits were in no way acceptable, no matter the context. Maybe some time off the PC would be helpful. Malc82 22:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree, Nikro. Not sure what you were thinking; you seem to be a productive editor, then out of the blue, you vandalize another user's page. Not cool. Please don't do it again. --barneca (talk) 22:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

He's my brother, and I told people why I done it on Wikidragons talk page.§→Nikro 14:10, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry to have to say this but I couldn't find the reason in the page's history, also are you 70.130.173.211, and finally your signature (which is what I, personally, think is the reason you vandalized) is published in a GNU Free Documentation License and therefore anyone can "copy and redistribute it, with or without modifying it, either commercially or noncommercially". Jeffrey.Kleykamp 21:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

My brother deleted the reason from his page, he told me about deleting it.

  • 1)First of all, I asked him if I can edit his page, he said "Go ahead." Then I asked him if he wanted the word "Yes" to be changed to "Neutral" or "Lost", he said "Which ever one".
  • 2)I was changing a lie he made about my work on wikiipedia.
  • 3)He tells to go ahead and edit it, then he deletes the reason for the changes on his talkpage, then he writes me up for vandelism, it looks like he set me up to get me banned, which he's known to do that. I say he should be banned for setting someone up for suspencen.
  • 4)If it was vandelism, Wikipedia would have noted it as vandelism, but they didn't.
  • 5)If he says "Go ahead", then he give me permission, thus it can't be vandelism, but what he's doing is vandelism to my charactor.

Trust me, he knewn about the reason on his talkpage, and he deleted it, and he told me. And I had permission from him to edit his page.Proove of my reason on hi's talkpage

This following is a copy from the user's talkpage history.

§→Nikro 10:55, 9 June 2007(UTC)

Now according to this conversation, WikiDragon tried to set me up to get me banned, anyone who aggrees, please comment. §→Nikro 08:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I did not give you permission, I said "Yeah, Ok" in a Sarcastic way, so it was NOT permission. And your excuse did NOT give you the right to change anything, neither the less, ADD something, or change my Signature! ¥→WikiDragon295 16:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

(posted on both talk pages) If either one of you ever bother to stop whining at each other, and look above, you'll count three independent editors who took time they could have been using to deal with other things, dealing with you jokers instead. I don't know which is worse, the childish dicking around you're doing, or the fact that it didn't occur to either one of you that you are wasting other people's time. Both of you please stay off my talk page until you've graduated Junior High School, at least. Wikidragon, in particular, reporting someone as a vandal in bad faith is a good way to get banned for disruption. --barneca (talk) 00:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply