User talk:WikiWikiWayne/Archive 32

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Lea Lacroix (WMDE) in topic Wikidata weekly summary #289
Archive 25Archive 30Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33Archive 34Archive 35

Onwiki

Smells like a duck - squwark - rebbit rebbit JarrahTree 09:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, JarrahTree. This clarifies nothing. What up? I do not speak Wikispecies. Having fun! Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 10:01, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
as you say at the top - Please be patient as we work toward resolution of any issues in a peaceful, respectful manner - the editing suggested to me a potential sock (aka a duck that squwarks etc), due to application of what I considered weirdness of edit history... but then stranger things happen JarrahTree 10:07, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, JarrahTree. Gotcha. Roger that. Ticks are hard to breast. Having fun! Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 10:11, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
where I am on the planet most eds are out drinking somewhere - the tics? ahah when I used to be a scout leader 10 years ago we used to get Amblyomma_triguttatum on the ankles at this time on a friday night.. trying to encourage adventurous ones to find their way in The Bush at night... sigh JarrahTree 10:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, JarrahTree. Tick was a double entendre. LOL. Having fun! Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 10:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
As an ozstrylian with british background I try to mangle entendres, metaphors and oxymorons all in one try :) JarrahTree 10:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
YUP blocked - smelt that way squawked that way was one :( JarrahTree 05:43, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

You've got mail!

 
Hello, WikiWikiWayne. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 02:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 02:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

19:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #287

Wikidata weekly summary #287 Global message delivery/Targets/Wikidata

15:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Question

Hi, Jackfork. May I ask why you approved this Pending Changes request? Ping me back. Having fun! Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 04:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Because Rotten Tomatoes said Justice League's approval was 40% not 39%. Why, did I miss something? Jackfork (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Jackfork. Good job. No, you did not miss anything. D'oh. Gotcha.   Take care. Having fun! Cheers! PS: it is 41% now, and 256 critics, which I have ammended. BTW, I was hanging out with the plebes that launched RT back in the late 90s. They have done a lot of good work, after graduating from CAL Berkeley. It was fun and exciting to see young, creative, good people have success with many projects. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 22:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Charles Manson photo

Why do you think this is public domain? Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

RM

The rationale you gave for the Billy the Kid versus Dracula move was totally invalid [18]. WP:TITLECASE does not apply to titles of works, which are governed by MOS:TITLES.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  08:51, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, SMcCandlish. In that case, I still see the case to downcase Versus per Wikipedia:Manual of_Style/Titles#Capital letters. I was heading to MOS:TITLES at first, but then got sidetracked by MOS:TITLECASE, even though they both come to the same conclusion: Versus should be versus.

However, for names of Wikipedia articles and of section headings in articles and pages, generally only the first word and all proper names are capitalized.

Versus is not the first word, nor is it a proper name.
I am all ears about this. You spend more time focused on this than I do. Having fun! Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 09:48, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Titles of works are governed by MOS:TITLES. You're not following the WP:P&G chain; WP:TITLECASE (at WP:AT) says to see WP:NCCAPS for details, and it spells out in brief how to do titles of works, with a cross-reference to MOS:TITLES/MOS:CT for more detail. A consequence of us not having a single style and titles page that is megabytes long and takes all week to read, is that one has to follow various cross-references to find all the subpages that interact in a particular case. I'm working on centralizing the titles-related stuff at MOS:TITLES since it has historically been very scattered.  — SMcCandlish ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ʌ<  02:09, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

Billy the Kid

Hi, Baffle gab1978. Awesome Possum! Having fun! Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 22:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Have you seen the recent news about another photograph? I saw this on the ABC's site today; thought it might interest you. Let me know if you want me to pause my c/e while you add the info. [19]. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:07, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Baffle gab1978. No, I had not seen that. Thank you for the heads up. I have uploaded the image to the Commons and I put it in a temporary spot on Billy the Kid. I will draft some text later after my eyes rest. I will put it it a new section. Yes, please hold off, so I do not waste your time, or lose you. Having fun! Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 03:38, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Greetings, Baffle gab1978. You are back in the saddle again. Feel free to shorten the name of the new section. And, a thousand thanks for the heads up, and all your edits. i really appreciate all of it. Having fun! Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 09:14, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
No worries, and thanks for adding the new text. I'm not quite at the photographs section yet, so i can c/e whatever you've added when I reach it. I came across the article about the 'new' photo completely by coincidence while reading the ABC's news site on my tablet, the day after starting the c/e. A happy find. :) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
  Done; Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Tips template

Hi Checkingfax,

Regarding the Tips template which Gamaliel kindly ceded to the project to avoid confusion with {{tps}} and other templates, I was thinking about how we should best repurpose it. Possibly a shortcut to an existing template (even temporarily)? (For the time being, I've placed some boilerplate there with a soft 404 in place of the redirect to the renamed old template.)

Or what I was thinking, possibly something like a new nav template that would include links to a lot of the basic Help pages and tutorials that a new to medium-new editor would find helpful. A lot of us have our own customized tips page (here's mine) and I would've loved something that gave me just the basics stuff from existing nav templates, a sort of one-stop-shop for policies, guidelines, simple references, basic editing, basic lists, bold, italic and blockquotes; a simple model of {{cite web}} and {{cite book}}. A pile of stuff like that. I could have fun creating something like that, mining some of the links off other nav templates, but really just the ones you need in your first few days/weeks/months here. And maybe a 'bottom' section, with links to all the other, more in-depth templates. I can work on a mockup in my sandbox or in my user draft space, and we can see what takes shape. Would love your feedback. Pinging Ben Creasy also. Mathglot (talk) 05:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)"

Hi, Mathglot. I work very part-time in our Tip-of-the-Day department. The heavy lifters are JoeHebda and The Transhumanist. Maybe there is a good fit there for Template:Tips. (courtesy ping to Ben Creasy. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 06:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC) {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 06:47, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
A tip-of-the-day thing might be a very good fit, if there's a need for it there. I'll wait for JoeHebda and The Transhumanist to comment, if they wish to. And thanks for the, uh, tip!   Mathglot (talk) 07:05, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
How 'bout, if Tips were fashioned into a user widget that people could place on their user page, with various params that might select the tip-of-the-day under criteria that interested that user, with possibly some display or rendering params for box shape or size, bg-color, borders, and so on. Or do we already have something like that? Template {{totd}} creates a largeish banner, maybe more real estate than I'd want to use on my User page, so maybe Tips could create a smaller one optimized for user page display along with other widgets, maybe a smallish box, with a briefer version of the text, with a link to the main one for those who wanted the more prolix version with the longer explanations? Mathglot (talk) 07:17, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
That seems pretty cool, altho not something I have time to work with. II | (t - c) 02:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
@Mathglot: (See below...)
Checkingfax, thank you for the ping. Mathglot, I like your enthusiasm. A great deal of work has gone into relevant projects, and it might be a good idea to review those first, before brainstorming ideas, to avoid duplicating what has already been done. Also, you might find something suitable for your purpose, or for adapting to your purpose. I'll do my best to provide a bit of a tour, of the areas I'm familiar with, below:
I hope you found the above tour both useful and entertaining. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 11:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Mathglot. Have you ruminated on this? Let me know what has sparked. Having fun! Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 08:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

WiR December highlights

 
Welcome to Women in Red's December 2017 worldwide online editathons.
 
 
 


New: "Seasonal celebrations" "First Ladies" "Go local!"


Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

Remember the World Contest closes on Thursday, 30 November

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 11:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #288

20:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

When is a ping not a ping?

I'm not sure what you meant by "ping me", but in case you meant "reply on my usertalk page", see [23] The Crab Who Played With The Sea (talk) 01:36, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, PauAmma. Many times editors reply from their talk page without setting a ping to me, and I miss their reply. So, I usually try to ask for a ping. Having fun! Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 02:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Convert sp=us

No problem, but for your information, {{convert}} accepts |sp=us only. That changes metre/litre to meter/liter, and some other changes which rarely make a difference. Variations such as sp=US are not accepted. That applies at Hoover Dam and One Montgomery Tower. Johnuniq (talk) 09:21, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Johnuniq. Good catch. I actually did catch that too, but did not get a chance to fix it. For some backstory, I believe that the {{As of}} template will allow |df=US or |df=us. Chit happens when you go off memory and forget to preview your work. LOL. Thanks again. I really appreciate it. Having fun! Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 18:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Campolindo High School

I don't know or care whether your problem is inability to use the automation you are using or just plain incompetency, but how do you figure adding blank templates improves an article. I am beginning to understand why you seem to be constantly appearing at ANI. Some unsolicited advice. Put the gadgets away and learn what you are doing. John from Idegon (talk) 23:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Dear John from Idegon. I have a speck in my eye when you have a log.
{{official website}}, {{authority control}}, and {{wikimedia|collapsible=true|wikt=no|d=Q123456}} are hardly empty templates. They are populated from instances in items at Wikidata. Take the pebble from my hand, Grasshopper.
Sounds like you spend too much time at ANI. I do not. Are you drunk? Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 05:04, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

I don't get angry easily

But this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Laucke&diff=710551869&oldid=710540691 is terrible on multiple levels. When you don't follow the template documentation and link to the official website in the infobox, it's a problem. Please stay away from that article as you are not editing with logic or guidelines in mind. When you remove maintenance templates, twice, it's inappropriate. I will take it to a larger community if you do it again. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:07, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

And then you tag me as being in an edit war because I'm applying correct editing guidelines and template documentation to an article that's a pet project of yours and you don't like the edits? Please don't ask for help for your projects if you are not willing to accept it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Walter Görlitz. I read your message above after I disruptive editing templated you. Let us go to the Michael Laucke talk page and discuss edits and reach a consensus on anything controversial. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 20:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
There is no need for local consensus when the documentation is clear. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:38, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Probably about time you stopped misusing the templates and Twinkle. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Checkingfax. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #289

17:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)