Wikicleric

Solomon and Dan Brown

The book you added links to is not "an alternative viewpoint", it is just another book about the Key of Solomon. As it stands the addition of links to that book do not add anything encyclopedic, the book itself is not notable and does not provide any more information about the subjects of the pages you added the link to. Qutezuce 08:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

It was debated on that very point and the result of the debate was to keep. The future novel by someone who's previous book spent a long time on various best sellers lists is very notable. As for it not being published, quoting from official Wikipedia policy: "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred." I think it is obvious that Dan Brown's next book falls into that category. But some random book being republished in blog form isn't notable as far as I can tell. If you can provide some proof that this book is notable I would be interested, but so far you have not. Qutezuce 02:16, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Wikicleric, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! PDCook (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

May 2010

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. Ckatz^chat_spy 05:03, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Resurrection Planet

I have nominated Resurrection Planet, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resurrection Planet. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. StAnselm (talk) 05:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)