Welcome!

edit
Hello, Wikier55! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 16:03, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Wikier55, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Wikier55! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Downgrading of citations at Lafayette Morehouse

edit

Hi! I am a former university reference librarian & a long time editor. I was surprised to find that you reverted three of my citation improvements & left only an explanation of Switched in the edit summary. Let's go through why I find your downgrading to be problematic.

  • Aquarius, Institute of Human Abilities, OCLC 857504947 {{citation}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help), published irregularly from 1969 to 2004
This citation points to the OCLC record for the journal, published "under the auspices of the Institute of Human Abilities" (search for that string in the article). This is important because it helps the reader to find the journal in libraries, albeit only three. I consider the OCLC publication start date of 1969 more accurate than 1970, unless you have a better source.
The previous citation, Flickr page, implies that this is the Flicker page of Lafayette Morehouse. It is not. It is a photograph of an individual who visited the property, & its full title is in the HTML title tag is "Lafayette 1 | Looking down towards the pool and the nightclu… | luckygirl | Flickr". I have added a more complete title & author information so it now looks like this:
  • The previous version Lafayette Morehouse - a brief history & resource guide, was simply incomplete & inadequate. As I subsequently realized that there was a version in references, I removed the version from the External links section & combined my previous version with the reference citation to produce:

I would invite you to read about how we do citation templates. I think that this would be useful for you, as most editors rather dislike it when they have placed a more complete citation template only to have it reverted to the previous incomplete & less informative version. Please remember that part of the Wikipedia:Prime objective is to provide free access to the sum of all human knowledge. I consider part of that vision to be the proper linking for references, external links, & further reading so that readers can easily access those knowledge sources.

Peaceray (talk) 16:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply


Wikier55: Ok I'm not sure if this is the right way to respond but I didn't intend to downgrade any of those citations, if I did it was a mistake, thanks for your work and feedback Peaceray!

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wikier55/sandbox

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Wikier55/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ca talk to me! 10:59, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply