Wikiforhistory
Welcome Wikiforhistory!
I'm DBigXray, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}}
on your userpage.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes
~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Wikiforhistory
editWikiforhistory, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Wikiforhistory! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC) |
Holy Land
editHello. I've asked for the Holy Land page to be moved back for the time being. Whilst I understand your point about bias, the move may be considered controversial, and it might be better to establish a consensus for the move in a requested move discussion first. There may be opposing arguments, such as evidence that the Abrahamic sense is the primary topic for the term "Holy Land". There are also the technical points that the move would create a malplaced disambiguation page, and fixing the incoming links would form an important part of any move. Certes (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
editYour recent editing history at shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Orientls (talk) 17:17, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Your polemic source say "Hindu supremacist" that's not same as claiming that their purpose is "Hindu supremacy". Stop misrepresenting sources. Orientls (talk) 17:17, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Talkback
editMessage added 19:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I have started a talk page discussion at the link above, you can share your concerns and comments there. DBigXrayᗙ 19:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC)