Wikikidboy

Welcome!

Hello Wikikidboy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Wikidudeman (talk) 07:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome

Hi, I was going to leave a welcome notice myself, but noticed it was already done. Just a couple of things I wanted to let you know about. The two logos and the image of the armbar on your user page are only being used on Wikipedia under something called "fair use". You can read about that at Wikipedia:Non-free_content, but one thing that it means is that we use them only in as limited a way as is necessary to contribute to the encyclopedia. Their use in user space is not allowed.

Thanks for your work on the MMA articles. Sancho 13:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

I see, it´s fixed now. Thank you.--Wikikidboy 14:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Growth Hormones

The growth hormones that bodybuilders use (The kind that works at least for what they are using them for) are illegal in the United States without a prescription. Prescription are limited (or are supposed to be) to people with health problems, meaning that doctors can only legally prescribe growth hormones to people for medical purposes. Where the majority of pro-bodybuilders get their growth hormones I can not say, simply because I do not know. The link you provided is a growth hormone but I would not recommend anyone use any drug simply because I'm not a doctor and I would not recommend you use that specific drug (I would recommend you do not) simply due to your age. There is no way to predict how someone who is not fully grown will react to any number of drugs, especially growth hormones, thus I would not recommend you use them unless your doctor thinks you should for medical purposes. Moreover, I try to keep my talk pages reserved for discussions directly related to Wikipedia articles, so if unless you have something to say related to a specific article or Wikipedia in general I would suggest you E-mail me. I also would suggest you not E-mail me for any information that is out of my field of knowledge, especially that relating to medical matters because I am not a doctor. I however would advise one thing, that unless your doctor prescribes you a steroid or growth hormone for medical purposes (which is unlikely to happen if you don't have some medical defect) you should not use them, especially at your age. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 13:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You are clearly a sockpuppet of the blocked vandal, Verdict (talk · contribs), who is not welcome on the Wikipedia. You have been blocked and all edits will be reverted. --Yamla 16:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikikidboy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am denying being Verdict. Look through all my contributions. Requesting review by another admin. I will contact Jimbo Wales and anything else if this Yamla, tryes anything else.

Decline reason:

I trust Yamla's judgment here; I've seen him successfully identify many Verdict sockpuppets. Your arguments are not convincing. Sean William @ 16:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You don't seriously believe admins are stupid enough to fall for this, do you? --Yamla 16:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Before I even make another request for unblocking, excactly what vandalism (since your calling me a vandal) have i´ve done? Excactly what of my contributions have been vandalism?--Wikikidboy 17:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

As a banned user, every single edit you have made with this account is by definition vandalism. Please see WP:BAN. --Yamla 17:10, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

That dosen´t make any sence at all. You have just said that you cannot explain how any of my edits have been vandalism to the articles. So how makes that me likely to Verdict or even an user that cannot be free to edit?--Wikikidboy 17:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

I will not disclose how I know that you are Verdict (talk · contribs) because you could then change your behaviour, making you harder to catch. I have, however, explained why every single edit you made with this account is vandalism; WP:BAN. --Yamla 20:02, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

No, none of any single edit of mine has vandalised any article. Show any of my contribution that can be indentified as vandalism before you block. You are just jumping to conclussion.--Wikikidboy 21:09, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

WP:BAN. Stop trolling or this page will be protected. --Yamla 21:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

What does trolling mean? You are avoiding to fix your own conclussion. Where is your proof of me being a banned user and where is your proof of me being a vandal? You don´t have to protect anything or block just beacuse you can. Just beacuse you are an admin dosen´t mean your always right or always doing the right thing.--Wikikidboy 21:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikikidboy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Again, I am requesting this unblock request to be reviewed by another admin (not the blocking one), and that the admin looks through all my contributions to see if any edit is indentified as vandalism or can recognize me as being a vandal, and if not, the right thing would be to unblock me.

Decline reason:

According to WP:BAN, any edits through block evasion are vandalism. — Sr13 22:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Email

Despite claiming here that he was not Verdict (talk · contribs), this user emailed me after the block and confirmed that he was indeed. This sort of behaviour is typical of this banned vandal and demonstrates why it would be inappropriate to unblock him. --Yamla 05:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Where is the text that I have done that? You lie about everything like the fact that I am a vandal well then show the contributions that are vandalism ones well you dont have that either now do you.--Wikikidboy 20:49, 28 June 2007 (UTC)