Wikikl-2

User talk:Wikikl
This page is a soft redirect.

New messages should be made to this editor's current user page. Messages created by scripts should be copied there.

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or sock puppetry.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sankar may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Sankar''' is an Indian [[movie director]], [[screenwriter]], [[short story writer]] and [[Novelist]. who works in [[Malayalam]] cinema and literature.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:41, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/sense

For technical reasons an AFC reviewer marked your AFC creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/sense, as ready for submission. I changed it to "draft" state. As-written, this draft has many issues. I recommend you work on cleaning up the articles that you have already written first before attempting to get this page ready for submission. When the page is ready for submission, you can just click on the "submit" button that's in the purple box at the top.

Please note that you have an obvious conflict of interest with "Sense, Ltd." as well as all products and services that it offers as well as any people associated with the company, either as investors, officers, employees, or clients. With this in mind, please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest before editing any ARTICLES related to anything in which you have a conflict of interest. You may continue to submit such articles through "articles for creation," just realize that once they are moved into the main encyclopedia, your ability to edit them without getting into trouble with other editors will be severely limited. You are also strongly encouraged to admit conflicts of interests where they exist. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:06, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Sankar

• I have moved to a new name Vijayamma Rajappan Sankar the new article which you put instead of the pre-existing useful disambiguation page Sankar. Please do not overwrite an existing article with a new article about another subject. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:50, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

  The page now resides at Sankar (film director). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:03, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Your usernames and a request at Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention

I have requested that the block that was placed on Senseltd (talk · contribs) for violating Wikipedia's username policy be restored and that the account under new name you requested, Wikikl (talk · contribs), be unblocked as it appears the block "followed" the account to its new name in error. See Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention and search for either "Senseltd" or "Wikikl." This notice is being placed on the talk pages of both accounts. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:02, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

This discussion was moved to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Complex username-block situation - Senseltd and Wikikl. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:12, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

It looks like someone finally fixed things. Your "new" account, which is not blocked, is Wikikl (talk · contribs). This is the "old" one, which is blocked. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:32, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Please do not blank pages unless you are the only significant contributor

On October 5, 2013, you blanked Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/V R Sankar. I reverted your edit. Please do not blank pages unless you are the only significant contributor or they are pages in "your" "user space" (that is, pages in this list plus your main user page, User:Wikikl). This page had several different registered accounts and several different non-logged-in editors who made significant contributions.

For pages that you are the only significant contributor to, you may ask that the page be deleted by adding {{db-author}} to the top of it. Note that just about anything other than a "bot" edit or simple typo- or formatting-fixes is considered "significant" and will result in this request being denied.

For pages you are not the only significant contributor to, you can use one of Wikipedia's established deletion mechanisms described at Wikipedia:Deletion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:03, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Poopoloral

The article Poopoloral has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable book per WP:NB. Not enough coverage by reliable sources, has won no awards, has not contributed to any major cultural events, is not the subject of instruction in schools, and author is not notable enough to automatically qualify all works as notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Mr. V (t – c) 05:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Kaappi marangalkkidayile penkutty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaappi marangalkkidayile penkutty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaappi marangalkkidayile penkutty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:05, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sankar (film director)

The article Sankar (film director) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

English-language references that are not dead links do not show significant coverage. Two awards do not have in-line references and are not found in the references I could read, and there is no indication that these awards are major enough to be a strong indicator of notability by themselves. His film's web site seems to be defunct.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Streetlight (film)

The article Streetlight (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that the film is notable as defined by WP:FILM or WP:GNG, see Talk:Streetlight (film) for discussion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Poopoloral

The article Poopoloral has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only references are the author's blog and a copy of the book cover. No indication that the book is notable. Author's notability is also questionable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Sankar (film director) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sankar (film director) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sankar (film director) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Poopoloral for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poopoloral is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poopoloral until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 05:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Poopoloral

Hello Wikikl-2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Poopoloral for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jyoti (talk) 07:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oru pennum parayathathu concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oru pennum parayathathu, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oru valakilukkathinte Oarmakku concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oru valakilukkathinte Oarmakku, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/cordoba group concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/cordoba group, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/cordoba group

Hello Wikikl-2. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "cordoba group".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/cordoba group}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 06:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oru pennum parayathathu

Hello Wikikl-2. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Oru pennum parayathathu".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oru pennum parayathathu}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:34, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oru valakilukkathinte Oarmakku

Hello Wikikl-2. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Oru valakilukkathinte Oarmakku".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oru valakilukkathinte Oarmakku}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/sense

Hello Wikikl-2. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sense".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/sense}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:09, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Sankar (writer & director) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sankar (writer & director) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sankar (writer & director) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The Doom Patrol (talk) 11:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)