Wikipeder74

This is Wikipeder74's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Palazzo Albertoni Spinola has a new comment

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Palazzo Albertoni Spinola. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 10:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

I've left a comment on my Talkpage. KJP1 (talk) 17:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Palazzo Albertoni Spinola has been accepted

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Palazzo Albertoni Spinola, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KJP1 (talk) 18:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giacomo Della Porta's Perspective (August 14)

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giacomo Della Porta's Perspective and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 03:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Wikipeder74! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 03:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic