Wikipedian64

File:Inyourway.jpg File:Inyourway.jpg File:Inyourway.jpg File:Inyourway.jpg File:Inyourway.jpg File:Inyourway.jpg

Sup! Wikipedian64 14:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

My concern about your username (Wikipedian64)

Hello, Wikipedian64, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

Specifically, the term "Wikipedia" is not allowed in usernames.

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

• If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
• If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as asking for a "third opinion", or requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Admins usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
• If you decide to just go ahead and change your username, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under the new username: simply request a new name here following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account.

Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your username is grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate; such names get reported straight to Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism (WP:AIV), or blocked on sight. This is more a case where opinions might differ, and it would be good to reach some consensus — either here or at WP:RFC/NAME. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. Thank you again! -- —Krellis (Talk) 16:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Username

I read the Username Policy, and see that it is clearly stated that usernames cannot have "Wikipedia" in them. But there is no real explanation on why this is so. Not trying to be rude or anything, and I understand the policy, but I would like a reason on why they (usernames) cannot have "Wikipedia" in them. Thanks.

P.S. If absolutely necessary, I will change my name before this becomes a problem, but I'd actually rather not change my name. Again, thanks. Wikipedian64 21:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

As I understand it, the policy prohibits the use of the term "Wikipedia" because it is a trademark owned by the Wikimedia foundation. To keep their trademark valid, they must control use of the term, and that includes forbidding it in usernames. —Krellis (Talk) 21:55, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Then Why are the people who had it before still allowed to have it? Wikipedian64 21:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Please see here for extensive discussion of this rule and why it was put into place. I was not part of the original discussion, and thus it is difficult for me to synthesize a simple answer for you - it is probably easiest to simply read the (lengthy) discussion for more information about how this policy came to be. —Krellis (Talk) 22:21, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

So Do I have to change my Name? Wikipedian64 23:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi there... Your going to need to select one account and stick with it. I noticed you were harassing SparrowsWing... are you done with that? That kind of behavior won't be tolerated for long. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 01:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

J.S., I'm really sorry about all of this. I will not harrass anyone anymore, or do anything. I am not using "Ziwhtam" anymore. I am sticking with "Wikipedian64" for good. You may clear all traces of Ziwhtam(I can't even edit my own userpage). I have learned my lessons on the importance of Wikipedia, so please, I beg of you, to let me start over, and lift the block on me. I will only make constructive comments/edits on Userpages/articles. Please lift the block. Thank you. Wikipedian64 20:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Return

Glad that you are back and I hope you enjoy editing. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism problems

It looks like you did the correct thing. AS long as they stop after you warn them that's the main thing. THere is a lot of information at Wikipedia:Vandalism and the templates for warning vandals are at Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. If you go through a set of warnings and they are still vandalsing then there is Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Remember to remain civil because sooner or later they will come here and swear at you or mess with your user page. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Yoshi

Actually, you are correct in that you didn't (necessarily) write anything untrue, but Wikipedia is about verifiability, not truth. Anything added must be verifiable, which requires citing sources. Sorry, but dem's da rules. Gene S. Poole 01:31, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use image use

Because per Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria item #9, the use of fair use images outside of the main article namespace it not permitted. The images I removed are all fair use, copyrighted images. You may not display them on your userpage. I am re-removing the images from your userpage. Please do not re-add them, or any other fair use, copyrighted images, as this is directly against policy. Hope this helps answer your question, --Durin 12:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Super Mario Wiki

A tag has been placed on Super Mario Wiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Super Mario Wiki. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. --Finngall ^talk 22:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Quebec is not a featured article

Please stop adding the "Featured Article" icon to the Quebec article. The article is not listed as a featured article and should therefore not be displayed as such. Should you feel the article deserves to be nominated as a featured article, please follow the nomination procedures. Thank you. — Dorvaq (talk) 16:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Quebec is not a featured article

Please stop adding the "Featured Article" icon to the Quebec article. The article is not listed as a featured article and should therefore not be displayed as such. Should you feel the article deserves to be nominated as a featured article, please follow the nomination procedures. Thank you. — Dorvaq (talk) 16:04, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Quebec. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 21:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Cross-namespace redirects

First, please don't create cross-namespace redirects, such as Wikiholic; the main article namespace is intended for encyclopedic articles, but the 'Wikipedia:' namespace documents various maintenance and meta-information about Wikipedia — but not encyclopedic content.

Second, redirects require brackets around the target article title; please see WP:REDIR for details. -- intgr ^#%@! 00:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

10T naming

I don't own the page. :-) Discussion about the title is currently ongoing on the talk page.--Eloquence* 09:26, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

You tube links in User space...

It is noted that you have linked to You Tube videos from user space, Please confirm that you are the copyright holder for the videos concerned, otherwise please remove the links from your user page.

Sfan00 IMG 11:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Super Mario Wiki

How come you're not active at the mariowiki anymore?--Mariofan90 00:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi it's me Fg from the mariowiki and I may think that you may remember me or not...--Mariofan90 00:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Nintendo Page Redesign

A new page design is being considered for the WikiProject Nintendo page. A rough draft can be viewed here. Please add all comments and thoughts to the discussion. From the automated, Anibot 23:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

MarioWiki

Are you sure that you're extremely busy from the mariowiki? cause your block expired already like months ago...--Mariofan90 (talk) 01:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Then ask a sysop to unbanned you from the forums.--Mariofan90 (talk) 20:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Super Mario Wiki

A tag has been placed on Super Mario Wiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 22:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Super Mario Wiki

A tag has been placed on Super Mario Wiki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Badgernet (talk) 22:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Super Mario Wiki, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 22:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gizoogle.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Gizoogle.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

March 2008

1. Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User:WBOSITG. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Funny. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{I push my hand up to the sky} 18:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
2. This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
   If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -- Quiddity (talk) 18:54, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
3. This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
   The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:About, you will be blocked from editing. I am especially concerned about the edit summary you left. Calling somebody a "bastard" is a WP:Personal attack. Puchiko (Talk-email) 22:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

• 

  You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for You are leaving disruptive edit summaries and reverting changes to your disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 22:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Game-uh Cube and User talk:Game-uh Cube

I have deleted the pages User:Game-uh Cube and User talk:Game-uh Cube under Criterion for Speedy Deletion #U2 (Nonexistent user. User pages of users that do not exist). Please refrain from creating userpages for non-existent accounts. Thanks.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 23:12, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

And User:Gam-uh cube and User:Game-uh cube and the corresponding talk pages and User:Wii_console, all of which appeared to be non-existent accounts. Also noticed you have edited User:Wii, which is a registered account. Please don't edit other user's userpages like that. If there are others would you please let me know here or tag them with {{db-nouser}}. Thanks.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 00:20, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to BOL has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Thingg^⊕⊗ 23:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Nate • (chatter) 11:03, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Super Mario Wiki

A tag has been placed on Super Mario Wiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ViperSnake151 02:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Wikipedian64, you will be blocked for vandalism. Please do not refactor my block message! I am referring this matter to another admin for further action. Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 20:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Inyourway.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Inyourway.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:SeibuLionsNewLogo.gif

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:SeibuLionsNewLogo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 02:46, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Moving pages

Regarding your edits [1], and [2]. Please see Help:Moving a page. Cirt (talk) 00:08, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SeibuLionsNewLogo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SeibuLionsNewLogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

3.141592653589 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3.141592653589. Since you had some involvement with the 3.141592653589 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Six Sided Pun Vows (talk | contribs | former account) 01:37, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

3.141592653589 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 3.141592653589. Since you had some involvement with the 3.141592653589 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Six Sided Pun Vows (talk | contribs | former account) 22:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wikipedian64. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wikipedian64. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wikipedian64. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)