Wikipediarocks17
A tag has been placed on The outlyers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hatch68 03:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Read the policies refered to in the deletion requests. You are required to use references to establish the notability of the band for inclusion in Wikipedia. See WP:Notability for more details.--Hatch68 04:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Nonsense edits
editPlease stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You run the very real risk of the total loss of your edit privileges. Don't blow your chance. - Lucky 6.9 04:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Look, please don't mess around. This is an honor system. It's also a serious site, an oft-quoted media source and one of the top ten sites on the entire internet. If you continue to add nonsense, your opportunity to contribute is kaput. - Lucky 6.9 04:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Your choice, man. You want in, you're in. Entirely up to you. - Lucky 6.9 04:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Mediation
editA mediation case has been opened in which your name is mentioned. I just signed up as a mediator, pending approval by the involved parties. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/User:Lucky 6.9 reverting his own Talk page. If you would like to be listed as a party, please write your name in the blue box. If you feel you are not involved, please remove your name from the list under "Who's involved?". (In this case, your name will only be allowed to be reinserted if a reason is given.) — Sebastian 22:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Update: The original case has been deleted by an involved party. I reported this incidend on administrators' noticeboard (now archived). Since I have not been asked by anyone to investigate this case, I will not pursue it any further. I'm not watching your user page anymore, so please let me know on my talk page if you have any questions or concerns. — Sebastian 20:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)