Wikipediting
9/3/15
editPlease stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Robert Jackson (politician), you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 15:56, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- I'm very confused by this. I will be banned for continuing to edit the page, when I am simply adding currently relevant information to a page? Have you read any articles I linked to? There is more that needs to be added.... for example the perennial candidate stuff needs to be updated because he's running in an election currently.Wikipediting (talk) 20:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Also instead of deleting my edits, you could just reword it to your liking. The information has to be there though. It's his current job, and is quite public. So if that is not satisfactory to you, then stop the edit wars and let's get the wikipedia police in here to sort this out now please.Wikipediting (talk) 20:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Please also detail the commentary and personal analysis I have added, because I am at a loss and fearful that if I keep editing I will be banned, without ever knowing why. You have warned me, but not explained why or what specifically you are warning me for, which leaves me to assume that you are in fact the one who is being disruptive.Wikipediting (talk) 20:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Your phrasing is full of weasel words and hyperbole and intentionally bombastic. I suspect a conflict of interest on your part. Please read WP's policies on neutrality. If you consistently demonstrate that you cannot edit with a NPOV then that is why you have been warned. Reasons have been given in edit summaries and on your talk page before you deleted them. JesseRafe (talk) 13:44, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Please also detail the commentary and personal analysis I have added, because I am at a loss and fearful that if I keep editing I will be banned, without ever knowing why. You have warned me, but not explained why or what specifically you are warning me for, which leaves me to assume that you are in fact the one who is being disruptive.Wikipediting (talk) 20:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Also instead of deleting my edits, you could just reword it to your liking. The information has to be there though. It's his current job, and is quite public. So if that is not satisfactory to you, then stop the edit wars and let's get the wikipedia police in here to sort this out now please.Wikipediting (talk) 20:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 30 October
editHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Robert Jackson (politician) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Robert Jackson 2013 Manhattan Borough President Palm Card.png
editThanks for uploading File:Robert Jackson 2013 Manhattan Borough President Palm Card.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 05:08, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 4 January
editHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Broadchurch page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:33, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Wikipediting. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)