Wikiuserideas

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Wikiuserideas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Teapotgeorge^Talk 20:44, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

References

references go at the end of the part they are referencing not the beginningTeapotgeorge^Talk 21:01, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Okay, just found the comments - I thought I hadn't saved correctly, so sorry for appearing as if I was engaging in 'editing war'. I removed the external links. Also, I would like to improve the tone to conform with Wiki standards. Suggestions would be welcome. Wikiuserideas (talk) 22:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Are my references setup correctly? - these are all the sites that reference the tagged content. Thanks Wikiuserideas (talk) 22:25, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

please provide a link to the specific article which relates to your question.My76Strat (talk) 01:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to LRP Publications. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 21:39, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on LRP Publications. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Teapotgeorge^Talk 21:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to LRP Publications.   — Jeff G. ツ 21:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Okay, just got to this page - I thought I got kicked out of my session...I had no idea an editor was on my page. I got a clue when I saw my edits were in conflict with someone else's. I scaled back the external links to what what was suggested.

I came here to respond to your request for help, but I can't see one. What do you need help with? --Deskana (talk) 22:14, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Okay yes, thanks - I'm confused. I just published the article. I the editor made changes. I changed the article several times (not knowing the number of edits allowed and not being aware of the edits being made simultaneously) How long must I wait to make the appropriate changes as it appears I might be in some trouble with the number of edits etc? Also, my tone in the article is off - is this as a resulting combination of tone and content - or strictly 'view points' that are not clearly referenced? Thanks! Wikiuserideas (talk) 22:34, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

For better interaction, please come to the live help assistance here [1]. My76Strat (talk) 02:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Edit summary

You have been advised twice now to provide edit summaries when you make a change to an article. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. thank you.Teapotgeorge^Talk 22:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Okay will do - sorry. Wikiuserideas (talk) 22:14, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of LRP Publications for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LRP Publications is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LRP Publications until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)