Willarveschoug
December 2008
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rosetta@home, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rosetta@home was changed by Willarveschoug (u) (t) score equals -1516 on 2008-12-01T20:20:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Did you just replace the Rosetta@home article with the entire text of Moby Dick?? Impressive. -M.Nelson (talk) 23:35, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Talkback
edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
And please remember to sign your posts with four tildes. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 20:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
It's not what I think, it's whether did not provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. the current version seems borderline OK jimfbleak (talk) 07:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
The file File:New wikipedia logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 07:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
