Channel 2 action news

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Channel 2 action news, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: WSB-TV. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Channel 2 action news

edit
 

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. DougsTech (talk) 19:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Channel 2 action news

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Channel 2 action news, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: WSB-TV. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

FYI, the term applies to a great many CBS affiliates across the country, not just WSB. KCBS in Los Angeles uses the term, for example. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello again. Please do not cut and paste material directly from the WSB-TV website or from any other website as this is a violation of copyright law. You'll lose your edit privileges if you continue to do so. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

As I pointed out, repeated copyright violations are grounds for a block. Please don't do it again upon your return. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Willpb9 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I now know not to cut& past on websites

Decline reason:

We'll see in a couple days. You were explicitly warned at 17:38, yet you posted 2 more copyright violations - one at 17:39 and one at 17:42. While you can claim that the first was saved before you were aware of the warning, you can't make that claim seem credible about the second. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:All News 1067 Logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:All News 1067 Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 08:30, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply