Windovernev

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(see: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • autoblocks)

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Brucejenner (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Windovernev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock. I am sorry for this misunderstanding. I take it all back. I want to be part of this fascinating and dynamic project, working side by side with really interesting and cool editors. In fact, there aren't enough LGBT pages on this website. I can help add more, because with a few more pages of how good and nice gays are (and their lifestyle) the world will be a better place

Decline reason:

Being sarcastic and facetious in your unblock request will not get you unblocked. Jayron32 04:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No prob. I will create a new account, easier that way for all of us

Add topic