Speedy deletion of Jennifer Cody

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Jennifer Cody requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 20:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

May I suggest developing the article prior to placing it into the article space. You can do so with a page like this:User:Windstorm2009/Jennifer_Cody, and once finished put it out there. When I tagged it, it contained only one link. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 22:03, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

September 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jennifer Cody has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Seba5618 (talk) 20:40, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply