Wingbac22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Originally the whole idea of this account was to vadalize which i admit was not a proper thing to do. In our journalism class we were required to show how flawed the internet was and how data which is put on sights, even as reliable as wikipedia and comcast were to be considered suspect. My editing was made as such. Each edit was printed out and handed into my Journalism teacher as I was on flawed side of the debate. The next few posts, the seth foster posts were not finshed first of all, but secondly were being made once again for this journalism class. Not only is Seth Foster's story essential to the argument but an interesting project which is very much true. All of the cited works were infact 7-10 page biographies written by different people taking the class (excluding Jeri Foster whose paper was not so much written as a large number of bulletpoints) overall your indefinte block of this account is not only unfair but truely a heartless and unplanned move this may not only lose many of us our professors favor but also a chance to move into another sphere of journalism. Please reconsider your action. with uttermost gratitude J.P. Shep
Decline reason:
That's quite the tall tale right there. Not only is the concept of a Journalism teacher who would assign you to vandalize Wikipedia extremely dubious, but the fact that he would choose to you to vandalize primarily a high school is even more dubious. However, the fact that your vandalism included information about another student at said school called "Stephen Kalina", who you then cited as an "author" in your article about Seth Foster inclines me to think you're not here to contribute at all and are wasting our time. Wikipedia is not a place to try out whatever dubious experiment your professor is trying out — and he should know that, if that the excuse isn't a total fiction to begin with. Your assertions above indicate that you intend to use this account for more vandalism in the future. The block stands. —-Haemo 01:51, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Please stop or I will now fully protected your talk page for abuse of the unblock template. --Haemo 03:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- I've fully protected this page, since you seem intent on abusing it. --Haemo 00:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)