User talk:Wintonian/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Wintonian. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
- Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief
The Signpost: 28 March 2011
- News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news
- In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news
- WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify
- Features and admins: Featured list milestone
- Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
License tagging for File:Uk censud 2011.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Uk censud 2011.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 April 2011
- Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?
- Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news
The Signpost: 18 April 2011
- News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
- WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 25 April 2011
- News and notes: Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Somerset
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Request to amend prior case; further voting in AEsh case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 2 May 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 16 May 2011
- WikiProject report: Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute
- Technology report: Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Why did you undo the formatting fix to Mad_Lib?
Exactly WHY did you revert my edit to Mad_Lib???? I made the page display the full sentence, not just the disembodied words. Just because I used the word "try" in my explanation??? (This was my third (non-cancelled) attempt at fixing the buggered formatting, so I was still thinking "try".)
(I also don't believe in leaving responses on IP-user pages, even if that's where you left me a message, and asked for a response there.)173.206.181.232 (talk) 09:44, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Apologies, I must have got a bit carried away as I have no idea now, I have rolled it back now. --Wintonian (talk) 09:53, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi Wintonian! Thank you for recent changes patrolling - your efforts are much appreciated. This is just to let you know that you shouldn't really have reverted this edit, as it was on Frostyboy27's user page. Warning messages should go on user talk pages, not user pages. Also, the warning you re-instated didn't have any context, so it is hard to link it to a specific event that could have warranted a final warning with no other warnings present... Could you give me any clues as to what the problem is? If you can I shall try and help you to the best of my ability. All the best. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 15:47, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- True and apologies, I was going to delve further into it not having time at that point, as it somewhat intrigued me that we had two users who seemed to rather fun of removing the warning from each other’s user/ talk page for some inexplicable reason, I can see that you later looked into it yourself, did you uncover a reason for the spat? --Wintonian (talk) 20:46, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- No worries - actually I was at a loss to the cause of this one too. It looks like it centered around the article UFC 131, but other than that I have no idea. I don't think it's a particular problem unless it flares up again - let me know if you spot anything. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 21:02, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, Just quickly looking at the edits of that article it seems one user was quite fond of inserting "Carwin has confirmed that he will win in round 6 by KO (rabbit punch)." and the other quite keen on removing it, so I'd take a guess on it being male bravado with each supporting the other contender. --Wintonian (talk) 21:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- No worries - actually I was at a loss to the cause of this one too. It looks like it centered around the article UFC 131, but other than that I have no idea. I don't think it's a particular problem unless it flares up again - let me know if you spot anything. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 21:02, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks...
The Userpage Shield | ||
Thanks for removing a decidedly terse remark from my talk page. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 13:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC) |
Anti-Obama dreck
We're gonna have to check every edit the anti-Obama anonymous user has made. Looks like he/she has been a busy beaver... Mark Sublette (talk) 22:52, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Mark SubletteMark Sublette (talk) 22:52, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Done, only made 1 rv as all the rest had already been rv'ed. --Wintonian (talk) 00:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Blinking12
Hi again Wintonian! Sorry, but I removed your comment to Blinking12 (talk · contribs) from my talk page. I don't really think WP:OWN fits this situation, because Blinking12 isn't exactly trying to control the article. Rather, they appear to be claiming credit for the article text, which is more of a copyright problem. I'm treading softly here, because this could have wider consequences - probably the best thing to do is to wait and see if they reply to my message or if they make any more stray edits. I've also left a message about this at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems#Business_broker. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 04:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- That WP:DOLT piece was rather useful (and an easier read than most) and your comments at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems (why no short link?) explained the issue for me, thanks. Ok I’ll sit back and let the big boys play with this, whilst watching and learning. Though if there are questions about copyrighted material and where it should be referenced to then shouldn’t it be kept out until this has been established? A bit difficult if they are referring to the whole article though. Anyway again thanks for that, there’s always something to learn around here. --Wintonian (talk) 04:29, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- For your information the original version you linked to over at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems the first two paragraphs are rather similar to the first here: [[1]] It's probably irrelevant but though I'd point it out just in case. --Wintonian (talk) 04:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- Well-spotted. That looks like it should go in the copyright problems thread - I'll add it now. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫
- The Types of services that a broker can provide section seems to be a substantial copy of [[2]], I believe this was the website (www.citizeneagle.com) that they wanted to insert, I'll remove, it can always be put back and tagged if you would rather. So they seem to be saying that possibly quite a bit has been copied and not just the first sentence/ paragraphs. --Wintonian (talk) 06:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- I have removed quite a bit more stuff that was substantially similar to sections of [[3]]. Have a look through and see if I missed anything if you so wish. --Wintonian (talk) 07:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- The Types of services that a broker can provide section seems to be a substantial copy of [[2]], I believe this was the website (www.citizeneagle.com) that they wanted to insert, I'll remove, it can always be put back and tagged if you would rather. So they seem to be saying that possibly quite a bit has been copied and not just the first sentence/ paragraphs. --Wintonian (talk) 06:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- Well-spotted. That looks like it should go in the copyright problems thread - I'll add it now. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫
- For your information the original version you linked to over at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems the first two paragraphs are rather similar to the first here: [[1]] It's probably irrelevant but though I'd point it out just in case. --Wintonian (talk) 04:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Haha, I'm not so sure about being a "big boy", but thanks! Yes, of course you are right, it should be kept out of the article. I didn't revert that last one because I was about to break WP:3RR. (I know copyright violations are one of the exemptions, but it doesn't look like the text Blinking12 added in their recent edit was copyrighted at all.) I don't think we can take out the offending text until we know what it actually is, so waiting seems the best policy for now. Also, I'll be watching this page for a while now, so you won't have to use any more talkback templates. Thanks for keeping an eye on this. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 04:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- No need to watch, ofcourse you can If you like :-), But I'll keep an eye on Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems to see how this sort of thing gets delt with, so next time I might be able to pass comment myself. --Wintonian (talk) 04:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Taker128
User talk:24.91.29.106 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Dongfang Bubai, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wintonian (talk) 10:56, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, I forgot to log in while doing the edit.
The reason I did not put reference to it was because it was obvious to naked eye. Prior to my edit, there is already the reference that Tohofuhai (東方不敗) is perhaps a homage to Master Asia who is known as Tohofuhai (東方不敗). In resulting wiki link, it was shown that the name was borrowed from the original (and copyrighted) character Dongfang Bubai(東方不敗)from Chinese martial art novel "The Smiling, Proud Wanderer" written in 1967. The fact that the Kanji(Chinese Character) that was used for Tohofuhai (東方不敗) in Rosario+Vampire is exactly the same should be a dead giveaway and not to mention it is one of most recognized fictional character Chinese character-using world. And if you look at Dongfang Bubai wiki page, it also listed Rosario character as one of the character that barrows the name's Japanese synonym. In addition the said character in Rosario is also of Chinese descent and series also has another Chinese character name Fei-Fong Wong (黄飛鴻) Who uses the name of a well-known, real-live Chinese martial artist Huang Fei-hung/Wong Fei-hung (黄飛鴻) who is consider a modern folk hero from the late Chin Dynasty. My addition did not make any direct claim, only point out an obvious synonym on what is already on the page and a known information (ie, Master Asia derived his nickname from Dongfang Bubai) I feel that the need for reference in this case is not needed, because it's like asking reference on whether nor not Cyclops' (Marvel Comic) name is derived from creature cyclops from the Greek myth.
- Fine, perhaps I should have looked more closely at the context, I'll remove the note in case you forget to log in again with the same ip. Using edit summarys does help though WP:ES--Wintonian (talk) 12:52, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, I'll keep that in mind. Also, I just added Chinese characters for Dongfang Bubai for easier comparison in the future. Taker128 (talk) 13:04, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Deletion of Ink stick
Ink stick is a disambiguation page that directs a user to either one of two more specific articles. You did not specify the reason for why you proposed the page for deletion. If you do not have any comments, I will remove your deletion nomination. -- Sjschen (talk) 17:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 May 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom referendum goes live; US National Archives residency; financial planning; brief news
- In the news: Collaboration with academia; world heritage; xkcd; eG8 summit; ISP subpoena; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Royal Railway
- Featured content: Whipping fantasies, American–British naval rivalry, and a medieval mix of purity and eroticism
- Arbitration report: Update – injunction from last week has expired
- Technology report: Wikimedia down for an hour; What is: Wikipedia Offline?
I could not get needed answers from the user deleted my article.
My article is deleted. How can I request for a feedback? Deleting does not really work for an improvement. Thank you.Aysinpir (talk) 15:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- The deleting admin has left some good advice on your talk page, mainly that your article came across as promotional and to have a look at WP:1ST. In answer to your question you have a copy that you created in your user space here: User:Aysinpir/Bilkent Erzurum, I would suggest putting a request into WP:RFF so the people over there can look over it and give you their thoughts and advice. It's quite good for a first article, referencing more, picking out the important bits and wording it so it comes across as less promotional will help. Good luck. --wintonian talk 15:44, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Can I add photos to my userspace draft?
Hi Wintonian,
It is possible to add photos on the article while it is a userspace draft? If it is possible how can I add these photos. In the information article (about adding photos) I could not understand opening a new profile for the photos part. How is the process? What should I do to add photos. Can you please inform me?
SincerelyAysinpir (talk) 06:44, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Yes you can as long as the image has an appropriate copyright licence or you can produce evidence of permission to use. Firstly you need to read WP:IUP & WP:FIT which detail the policy and explain how to find appropriate images. WP:IMAGE and WP:UPI describe the process of using images once a suitable one has been found. But please note images without an appropriate licence or permission will be deleted. Hope that helps. --wintonian talk 10:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 June 2011
- Board elections: Time to vote
- News and notes: Board resolution on controversial content; WMF Summer of Research; indigenous workshop; brief news
- Recent research: Various metrics of quality and trust; leadership; nerd stereotypes
- WikiProject report: Make your own book with Wikiproject Wikipedia-Books
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases pending resolution; temporary desysop; dashes/hyphens update
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 13 June 2011
- News and notes: Wikipedians 90% male and largely altruist; 800 public policy students add 8.8 million bytes; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Aircraft
- Featured content: Featured lists hit the main page
- Arbitration report: More workshop proposals in Tree shaping case; further votes in PD of other case
- Technology report: 1.18 extension bundling; mobile testers needed; brief news
The Signpost: 20 June 2011
- News and notes: WMF Board election results; Indian campus ambassadors gear up; Wikimedia UK plans; Malayalam Wikisource CD; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Elemental WikiProject
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: One case comes to a close; initiator of a new case blocked as sockpuppet
The Signpost: 27 June 2011
- WikiProject report: The Continuous Convention: WikiProject Comics
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision for Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 4 July 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year 2010; data challenge; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Star-Spangled WikiProject
- Featured content: Two newly promoted portals
- Arbitration report: Arb resigns while mailing list leaks continue; Motion re: admin
The Signpost: 11 July 2011
- From the editor: Stepping down
- Higher education summit: Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap
- In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia compared; Putin award criticized; possible journalistic sockpuppeting
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Albums
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tree shaping case comes to a close
- Technology report: WMF works on its release strategy; secure server problems
The Signpost: 18 July 2011
- In the news: Fine art; surreptitious sanitation; the politics of kyriarchic marginalization; brief news
- WikiProject report: Earn $$$ free pharm4cy WORK FROM HOME replica watches ViAgRa!!!
- Featured content: Historic last launch of the Space Shuttle Endeavour; Teddy Roosevelt's threat to behead official; 18th-century London sex manual
- Arbitration report: Motion passed to amend 2008 case: topic ban and reminder
- Technology report: Code Review backlog almost zero; What is: Subversion?; brief news
The Signpost: 25 July 2011
- Wikimedian in Residence interview: Wikimedian in Residence on Open Science: an interview with Daniel Mietchen
- Recent research: Talk page interactions; Wikipedia at the Open Knowledge Conference; Summer of Research
- WikiProject report: Musing with WikiProject Philosophy
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened; hyphens and dashes update; motion
- Technology report: Protocol-relative URLs; GSoC updates; bad news for SMW fans; brief news
The Signpost: 01 August 2011
- In the news: Consensus of Wikipedia authors questioned about Shakespeare authorship; 10 biggest edit wars on Wikipedia; brief news
- Research interview: The Huggle Experiment: interview with the research team
- WikiProject report: Little Project, Big Heart — WikiProject Croatia
- Featured content: Featured pictures is back in town
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision submitted for one case
- Technology report: Developers descend on Haifa; wikitech-l discussions; brief news
The Signpost: 08 August 2011
- News and notes: Wikimania a success; board letter controversial; and evidence showing bitten newbies don't stay
- In the news: Israeli news focuses on Wikimania; worldwide coverage of contributor decline and gender gap; brief news
- WikiProject report: Shooting the breeze with WikiProject Firearms
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Manipulation of BLPs case opened; one case comes to a close
- Technology report: Wikimania technology roundup; brief news
The Signpost: 15 August 2011
- Women and Wikipedia: New Research, WikiChix
- WikiProject report: The Oregonians
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case opened, two more still in progress
- Technology report: Forks, upload slowness and mobile redirection
The Signpost: 22 August 2011
- News and notes: Girl Geeks edit while they dine, candidates needed for forthcoming steward elections, image referendum opens
- WikiProject report: Images in Motion – WikiProject Animation
- Featured content: JJ Harrison on avian photography
- Arbitration report: After eleven moves, name for islands now under arbitration
- Technology report: Engineering report, sprint, and more testers needed
The Signpost: 29 August 2011
- News and notes: Abuse filter on all Wikimedia sites; Foundation's report for July; editor survey results
- Recent research: Article promotion by collaboration; deleted revisions; Wikipedia's use of open access; readers unimpressed by FAs; swine flu anxiety
- Opinion essay: How an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tennis
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four existing cases
- Technology report: The bugosphere, new mobile site and MediaWiki 1.18 close in on deployment
Hey vintonian this is urgent can you help me?
Is there a possibility for another person to write about the same topic as mine? I mean my article Bilkent Erzurum.Aysinpir (talk) 18:35, 30 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aysinpir (talk • contribs) 18:31, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not quite sure what you mean, if you mean you have created an article and wish to know if other people can edit it, then yes of course they can Wikipedia is an open encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. --wintonian talk 13:24, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 September 2011
- News and notes: 24,000 votes later and community position on image filter still unclear; first index of editor satisfaction appears positive
- WikiProject report: Riding with WikiProject London Transport
- Sister projects: Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Opinion essay: The copyright crisis, and why we should care
- Arbitration report: BLP case closed; Cirt-Jayen466 nearly there; AUSC reshuffle
The Signpost: 12 September 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports on research, Kenya trip, Mumbai Wikiconference; Canada, Hungary and Estonia; English Wikinews forked
- WikiProject report: Politics in the Pacific: WikiProject Australian Politics
- Featured content: Wikipedians explain two new featured pictures
- Arbitration report: Ohconfucius sanctions removed, Cirt desysopped 6:5 and a call for CU/OS applications
- Technology report: What is: agile development? and new mobile site goes live
- Opinion essay: The Walrus and the Carpenter
The Signpost: 19 September 2011
- From the editor: Changes to The Signpost
- News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised
- Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork
- WikiProject report: Back to school
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word
- Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Wintonian! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
The Signpost: 06 February 2012
- News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors
- In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned
- Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts
- WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones
- Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure
The Signpost: 13 February 2012
- Special report: Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters
- News and notes: Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Stub Sorting
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 20 February 2012
- Special report: The plight of the new page patrollers
- News and notes: Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering
- Discussion report: Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Poland
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 27 February 2012
- News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming
- Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention
- WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction
- Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open
- Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting