WitKid
Your relationship to these one-edit users?
editWhat is your exact relationship to these users? Please be completely honest, since a checkuser can reveal any deception.
- Roger13Zimmerman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- 68.147.133.115 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Pyroball (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- LesaLC (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Aaron.c.zimm (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Sockpuppetry case
editYou have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Roger13Zimmerman for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Blocked as a sock puppet
editWitKid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Could you unblock me in 1 week from Wikipedia please? I went along with Roger13Zimmerman and put my comment into the Colorpuncture debate to Keep the article. This was the first time I used Wiki as an editor and was not aware of the meatpuppet or sockpuppet rules. I am aware of them now, and will follow Wiki rules in the future.
Decline reason:
Basically the same wording as on your other account, User talk:LesaLC. One account per person; this one will remain blocked since its sole purpose is done. Mangojuicetalk 15:25, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Before this request can even be considered, you need to give a full, complete and accurate answer to the question posed at the top of this page regarding your relationship to a number of other editors. In answering be aware of the fact that checkusers may have the ability to confirm or refute your answer. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 11:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)