Wkyt07

Law and Order

Look man Sergeant and Detective are two different things. They are not they same role. Not in real life, and not in Law and Order. Take Law and Order SVU for example: John Munch was a Senior Detective promoted to Sergeant. Although they seem to be they same role, they are not and shouldn't be treated as such. Also I recant what I said. However if you can get an Admin to overrule me then by all means I will back off otherwise we will both get banned from editing. DeadmanUndertaker 01:48, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

By the way I was saying that to more experienced then me editors who didn't think it was a good idea, but seeing as you are the only one who disapproves then I guess I am right. Also you should probably look up the difference between Detective and Sergeant. I have been led to believe that Sergeant is above Detective, although no one can ever tell with all the stupid ranks they have. DeadmanUndertaker 01:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Also if you are looking for an Admin I suggest LAX. He is an Admin who knows his way around. Also if you wish to make a comment back to me then go to my talk page, but I should warn you that any obscene behavior will be considered personal, attacks towards me, and personal attacks are considered abuse which will get you banned. DeadmanUndertaker 01:57, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Remember that we are all here to edit, and although we don't always agree, we can usually come to a compromise. Please let there be no hard feelings, and I hope you enjoy your time here. Again write on my talk page for response which you can go to here User talk:DeadmanUndertaker. DeadmanUndertaker 02:00, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

I don't know why you are replying to yourself since this is my first reply to your comments. And frankly I don't know what "obscene behavior" you are talking about. But since there isn't an existing discussion on this matter, I'm going to put these comments on Talk:Law & Order so other editors can debate. Wkyt07 (talk) 02:07, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Look noob nobody actually cares, but everyone knows that Sergeant and Detective are two different roles. In other words your not going to win. If somehow you do I don't really care, I am a watcher really. Also I meant don't commit any obscene behavior. Have a good life. P.S. No comments will be read nor acknowledged. DeadmanUndertaker 02:12, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

To any editors who may be reviewing this conversation in the future, please note that I have never commited any "obscene behavior" (or any behavior for that matter) towards User:DeadmanUndertaker, and it can be confirmed by examining my edit history. Talk about bad luck with your first edit ... Wkyt07 (talk) 02:32, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

I have put my comment on the section you created on Talk:Law and Order. I don't care what happens. I know I am right, if thry don't agree that's there problem. Yeah it is bad luck since you don't know what your talking about. Good luck with a response since I don't care and won't acknowledge. Better luck next time. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha DeadmanUndertaker 02:39, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

I am tired of this senseless crap, as two editors we should be able to come to a compromise instead of argueing like babies. Your chart from New York times has left out characters, and looks stupid and is invalid. We have to come to a compromise. I agree they served identical purposes, but Sergeants and Detectives are different ranks and different roles, so there should be two collounms. Take a look a this Law & Order: Special Victims Unit in the cast table Sergeant collounm was vacant all the way until the 9th season. John Munch finally filled it. Again he still investigates sex crimes but now he is a Sergeant, and that means he is in a different role. Look I am sorry for my conduct, but there is more crap about this than there needs to be. I hope you and I can come to some kind, any kind of compromise, since that is the only way this can be resolved. Respond A.S.A.P. please, I want to resolve this. DeadmanUndertaker 05:16, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Please acknowledge that because of my edits there is more info on the psychiatrist collounm. My edits have been helpful here and I took time to make sure it all made sense, I didn't just put some crapy chart together. In other words at least it makes sense and I designate and acknowledge all the roles. DeadmanUndertaker 05:21, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

I want to ask you, why have you made such a big deal about this? Nobody else cared about my edits, in fact in wasn't even my idea, go here List of Law & Order seasons. Clearly other people thought it was a good idea. Please either come to a compromise with me or leave it alone. I know you are new here and even though you didn't want to get caught in one You are in an edit war. DeadmanUndertaker 05:28, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Trust me man. People see where you are coming from, don't you think they have already been through this? If they had thought your way was better they would have done it that way, and I would have never gotten the idea to change the one table to the way the List of seasons one is. There are thousands of editors here who finally decided on my table. Please let this go, now you are just vandalizing things and will be banned. DeadmanUndertaker 05:40, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Um, actually "thousands of editors" settled on the original table before you changed it without discussion. As I said before, this matter has been transfered to the article's discussion page, so please discuss there. I haven't even edited the article since your last revert, and the way you bombard my talk page with comments every 10 minutes is getting quite annoying. Aside from this, I don't see anything in those comments of yours that are actually worth responding. Wkyt07 (talk) 07:01, 17 August 2008 (UTC)