Wolfman29
This user is a member of the Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia. |
Be Afraid of All of my User Boxes!
|
Ha
editI'm not scared!!! Karibear 17:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Star Trek (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
June 2007
editPlease stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Star Trek, you will be blocked from editing. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 17:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:Judaism/Information
editPortal:Judaism/Information, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Judaism/Information and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Judaism/Information during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- -- -- 02:21, 31 March 2014 (UTC)