Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Eagleash (talk) 10:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daz Hale (August 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 16:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Wolvesblogger! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 16:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

August 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Jeff G.. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Draft:Daz Hale, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See also WP:BLP. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 10:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daz Hale (August 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 13:21, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Wolvesblogger. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 10:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm still unsure why this is becoming such a difficult task. Daz Hale has been a BBC broadcaster for over 20 years. He isn't paying me to do a Wiki for him, and has supplied the content, none of which is exaggerating any of his career achievements - its all factual and as such I've tried to reference where I can. I've looked at similar Wiki pages of his colleagues and they use a lot of the same citation sources. I've followed all the guidelines and I'm not how to progress this any further other than trying to get a second opinion? I don't work with Daz and I reiterate that he isn't paying me. It should be a simple Wiki page for someone who has a decent radio profile and is a recognised person within his profession. At the moment it just feels there are so many digital barriers in my way, I find it a bit exasperating and slightly counter-intuitive. Would I be better off supplying the content to someone else to set up the page or are they just going to hit the same insurmountable hurdles as I am? Many thanks, Nathan. Wolvesblogger (talk) 10:24, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I have restored Draft:Daz Hale per your request at RfU. From what I understand of the above, you have an external connection with the subject, and it is not paid editing. You have a WP:Conflict of interest and will have to disclose the same. See WP:DISCLOSE for details, or you can message me if you require help. Thanks. Jay 💬 10:56, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Daz Hale

edit

  Hello, Wolvesblogger. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daz Hale, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Daz Hale

edit
 

Hello, Wolvesblogger. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daz Hale".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:16, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daz Hale (October 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Daz Hale

edit
 

Hello, Wolvesblogger. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Daz Hale".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! 10mmsocket (talk) 15:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply