edit

Hi, I see that you've nominated a number of Wolverhampton-related articles for Good Article status. I would strongly advise you against this, as none of them seem to meet the criteria for GA status. Wolverhampton railway station, for example, is lacking references and one of its sections is outdated. I would urge you to give the GA critiera a good read before nominating articles for GA status. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 21:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply