Wood Geek
Welcome!
editHello, Wood Geek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting Started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! -RFD (talk) 22:07, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
editPlease note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 16:04, 1 February 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Geography headers
editHi Wood Geek! I noticed that you changed about 100 headers in US geography articles from "Geography" to "Geography and native vegetation". Unfortunately, that's a standard header used throughout thousands of Wikipedia articles that is intended to cover topography, soils, vegetation, weather, etc. So how about if you change the headers in these articles back to the standard? Thanks. 70.134.229.138 (talk) 16:31, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Wood Geek. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
February 2017
editI have reverted your change of 'centre' to 'center' in Bohemia as that article does not use American English. For details, see WP:ENGVAR. YBG (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Wood Geek. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Wood Geek. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Citing sources
editI saw you messed-up the Frim-Fram Sauce article, both by adding extraneous text (notice the Italic text you added at the top of the article) and by not referencing content correctly. If you want some help, just ask. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:55, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Oak Wilt Collaboration?
editAre you still active on Wikipedia? Yes I am, and will be adding the information You are looking for, today. Steve Nelson 5-16-19
I have no expertise in Oak Wilt, but have a real-life situation that has generated a lot of questions, some of which are not answered by the Wikipedia Article on Oak Wilt. Rather than reinvent the wheel, my first thought is to find a more-experienced Wikipedia Editor with some knowledge of Oak Wilt. In particular, I wonder if the Article would be improved, if a special section on Live Oaks were to be created. I have the general impression that they are different than either red or white oak, but do not know to what extent. My questions center specifically on Live Oaks, as that is what my IRL situation concerns. Also, there's a lot of mention of "fungal bed" throughout the Article, and I think it would be good to go into describing what they are, and possibly what they look like, and maybe an image. Finally there's this term regarding how an infected oak's leaves are "chorlo-something-inated", and I thought an explanation of that, and possibly an image, might improve the Article. These are my initial questions, and I'll probably have more as I educate myself through various sources. Are you interested in working on this Article again?Tym Whittier (talk) 22:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll monitor the Article and message you as the need arises.Tym Whittier (talk) 20:09, 16 May 2019 (UTC)