Wioaw
Welcome!
edit
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Touch (Earth, Wind & Fire song) (May 10)
editIssues noted and addressed with Touch (Earth, Wind & Fire song).
Your submission at Articles for creation: Heritage (Earth, Wind & Fire song) has been accepted
editThe article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 20:15, 16 May 2018 (UTC)Aforesaid issues acknowledged and addressed. Woojy88 (talk) 14:16, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Aforesaid issues acknowledged and addressed. Woojy88 (talk) 13:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Pockets- Come Go With Us.jpg
editAforesaid issues acknowledged and addressed with File:Pockets- Come Go With Us.jpg. Woojy88 (talk) 20:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Image without license
editAforesaid issues acknowledged and addressed with File:Pockets- Come Go With Us.jpg. Woojy88 (talk) 20:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
thanks, but...
editThanks for your edits on the Deniece Williams article, but you're not formatting content correctly. For instance, you linked to Billboard magazine rather than Billboard (magazine) and then you didn't format it correctly, just as you're not formatting albums or songs correctly. Would you like to learn how to do it correctly or would you rather have others clean-up after you? Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
In terms of wiki links and the like i've endeavoured to cite and edit these according to stipulated guidelines. As is the case there's no indication of such improper formatting as you've suggested in either the article's history or it's current state. Those edits which you've made though paraphrased wiki links instead of correcting any of its perceived errors. With this being said can you please note exactly where i've gone about formatting the article in an improper manner altogether?Woojy88 (talk) 4:50, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:EarthWind&Fire - September 99.jpg
editAforesaid issues acknowledged and addressed with File:EarthWind&Fire - September 99.jpg. 17:44, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Earth, Wind & Fire-Magnetic.jpg
editTypos/errors fixed with File:Earth, Wind & Fire-Magnetic.jpg. Woojy88 (talk) 04:34, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Norman Brown (Better Days Ahead).jpg
editTypos/errors fixed with File:Norman Brown (Better Days Ahead).jpg. Woojy88 (talk) 11:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Earth, Wind & Fire Horns) has been reviewed!
edit{{subst:Reviewednote-NPF|1=Earth, Wind & Fire Horns|2=Doomsdayer520|3=Thanks for your new article on Earth, Wind & Fire Horns. Unfortunately it looks like information on this ensemble is quite thin outside of the main band, and I am concerned about their notability as a stand-alone entity. In comparison, that's not a problem for [[Phenix Horns[[. Consider moving info you have found on EWF Horns to a new or expanded section within Earth Wind & Fire's main article.}}
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:25, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Well the article Earth, Wind & Fire Horns meets several notability guidelines within Wikipedia:Notability (music) under the heading "Criteria for musicians and ensembles". At first under point 1 of the criteria as the horn section "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself". Additionally under point 6 which states that "Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles." This article also meets point 6 of the criterion being "Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc." With this being so the article Earth, Wind & Fire Horns is thus notable in accordance to these stipulated guidelines and shouldn't be merged into the article Earth, Wind & Fire whatsoever. User:Woojy88 (Talk 19:37, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Norman Brown (After The Storm).jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Norman Brown (After The Storm).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Understatement of the year...
editRegarding this edit... You get the understatement of the year for that edit summary. Thanks for fixing that. I'm working on a cleanup script and it still has a number of bugs. I missed that one and really appreciate you catching it! --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:44, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Oh you're most welcome. (Woojy88.) (talk) 11:52, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
When Love Goes Wrong
editYou'll have to let me know how I diminished the article When Love Goes Wrong. It was like a two sentence stub, and all I did was fix the language of one sentence and made a couple other minor improvements. You're acting like I redirected the article. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me
Well I was speaking to those guidelines for improving and expanding stub articles as in Wikipedia:Stub, Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub improvement and Wikipedia:Stub Contest which you should always follow. (Woojy88.) (talk) 11:52, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- One is a WikiProject, which I am not a part of (the aim for those who are is to expand stub article, so I applaud those who are doing that), one is a contest, which I don't participate in, and one is the guideline, which I did nothing to violate. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:27, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Live in Japan (Earth, Wind & Fire video)) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Live in Japan (Earth, Wind & Fire video).
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.
Thanks for your new article on "Live in Japan" by Earth, Wind & Fire. I recommend adding some text from professional reviews if available, to achieve an article that does more than simply announce the video's existence.
To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Woojy88. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Robots- Original Motion Picture Soundtrack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Robots (2005 film)#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- As per your noteworthy guidelines i've gone on to start a new article of the soundtrack as an album. Woojy88 (talk) 23:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
File:Robots- Original Motion Picture Soundtrack.jpg listed for discussion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robots- Original Motion Picture Soundtrack.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:30, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- As per your noteworthy guidelines i've gone on to start a new article of the soundtrack as an album. Woojy88 (talk) 23:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Articles Nominated for Deletion - Tequila Mockingbird (song) and Tahiti Hut
editIf it interests you, would you please take a look at these discussions of songs written by Larry Dunn and Maurice White of Earth, Wind & Fire that are nominated for deletion? Never had anything like this happen before. Not a professional wikipedia editor nor familiar with edit wars until this week. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tequila_Mockingbird_(song) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tahiti_HutRosedelune (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editExternal Links & other
editThank you for your improvements. Would appreciate if you would revert the deleted external links as they are all different and include the The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon and the original recording of Tequila Mockingbird by Ramsey Lewis - or is there a reason you deleted theme? Is there a limitation to external links? In that case I think the original version is the one that is produced by Larry Dunn and the The Roots on The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon should be included at the external links.
Also there is this page that is being threatened for deletion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tahiti_Hut I would have created an album page for "Love Island" album by Deodato or would be grateful if it interests you. I simply cannot figure out how to revert the redirect from Love Island (album) to Eumir Deodato's page. I asked for advise from the editors in the discussion and no one is replying. I made the track list but then found no way to revert the redirect.
No. | Title | Writer(s) | Length |
---|---|---|---|
1. | "Area Code 808" | Deodato, George Parrish, Jr | 6:45 |
2. | "Whistle Bump" | Deodato | 4:32 |
3. | "Tahiti Hut" | Maurice White | 4:27 |
4. | "San Juan Sunset" | 4:15 | |
5. | "Love Islandd" | Deodato | 6:40 |
6. | "Chariot of the Gods" | Don Juan Mancha, Edwin Starr | 3:09 |
7. | "Pina Colada" | [Deodato]] | 5:55 |
8. | "Take The “A” Train" | Billy Strayhorn | 3:48 |
Rosedelune (talk) 06:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Well as those external links had been referenced throughout, you could go on to make further cites instead within the main article. With such being so i've already started the article Love Island (Deodato album) which you could go on about further editing together with the appropriate redirects being towards Eumir Deodato's page. Woojy88 (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHello, Wioaw
Thank you for creating If I Only Knew (album).
User:Sulfurboy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
good thanks
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sulfurboy}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Blues & Soul R&B chart
editSorry, I completely disagree with you about this chart being a national chart "by extension"... on what basis do you have evidence for saying this? What is the chart based on – sales, airplay? I will open up a discussion at WP:Record charts to get consensus on using this chart but I don't see how this can possibly be considered a national chart just because no other one existed at the time. Richard3120 (talk) 20:43, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
The Blues & Soul British R&B Albums chart is a national chart of England and the United Kingdom. This was the only major chart which focused on Soul Albums and Singles in the United Kingdom from the late 1960s to the early 1990s. The charts were compiled on the basis of record sales and so on. As such these charts are very essential to conceptualizing and understanding the British Soul Music scene during that era.[1] Given the importance and the necessity of these charts they should be kept as is. Wioaw talk 16:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Record charts#Blues & Soul British R&B Albums chart. You are welcome to contribute there. Richard3120 (talk) 20:57, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
"Favorable"/"unfavorable"
editPlease don't add these to the ratings table – apart from not actually being a rating, it's a subjective opinion as to whether a review is favorable or not, and as such it has in the past been considered original research... see the discussion at Template talk:Album ratings/Archive 1#Favorable/Unfavorable for example. Either way, you should not be adding this without a consensus. Richard3120 (talk) 14:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
What's that supposed to mean though? Anyone can read those reviews and ascertain just as I did that its a slightly positive or very positive review or a mixed and or poor review. What's your point exactly?Wioaw (talk) 16:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- The point is that other editors came to the conclusion that those reviews without an actual rating shouldn't be included in the ratings table, and spent months taking them out, and now you're unilaterally deciding to put them back in again. Richard3120 (talk) 15:39, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Well you can follow Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Album article style advice#Critical reception to understand and ascertain those guidelines and procedures with regard to album reviews and so forth. As such you'd also recognise, notice and acknowledge that I've wholeheartedly adhered to and followed those guidelines and procedures throughout while editing upon Wikipedia. Wioaw (talk) 17:05, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Well, it looks like I'm going to have to open up another discussion on this... Richard3120 (talk) 16:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Please User:Richard3120 it would be very wise to avoid descending into WP:Edit Warring over such a trivial and simplistic issue.Wioaw (talk) 17:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not edit warring, I haven't changed any of your edits. However, changes like this are done on consensus, so we should get a consensus on whether these should be included in the ratings table or not... especially as previous consensus was to remove them. Richard3120 (talk) 17:14, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Well as a user on Wikipedia you should be aware of the fact that according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Album article style advice#Critical reception it's up to the various users of Wikipedia to gain consensus and discern how a review should be rated as either favorable or otherwise. As well can you disclose where on Wikipedia did a discussion occur about entirely removing favorable/unfavourable reviews from the ratings table on Wikipedia articles. If I'm not mistaken that'll be strange and very contrary to those guidelines and procedures that's stipulated for editing in this regard by Wikipedia. With such being said can you please acertain this article(s) so as to prove and support your perplexing comments and argument.Wioaw (talk) 18:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Err... I already linked to such a discussion above in my first post? Anyway, I opened a discussion at Template talk:Album ratings#Adding "favorable"/"unfavorable" to the albums rating table and you are welcome to comment there. Richard3120 (talk) 17:58, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
editHello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Deniece Williams does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:05, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Hold Me
editWhy didn't you just create the article for "Hold Me" at Hold Me (Earth, Wind & Fire song)? StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Multiple accounts
editUser:Rowaio has similar editing patterns and writing style as you, so be sure to read WP:MULTIACCOUNT before you continue to edit from both accounts. You should add the {{User alternative account}} template to your talk pages, but I would recommend only editing from one account. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Philip Bailey & Little Richard- I Know.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Philip Bailey & Little Richard- I Know.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Earth, Wind & Fire-Touch.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Earth, Wind & Fire-Touch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Earth, Wind & Fire-Spread Your Love.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Earth, Wind & Fire-Spread Your Love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 11
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martin Page, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BPI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
editHello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Earth, Wind & Fire while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. See Special:Contributions/86.106.31.0/21. Binksternet (talk) 01:10, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Well first to begin I didn't do such and secondly please avoid Edit Warring in this instance. Wioaw (talk) 11:22 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Deniece Williams - Songbird.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Deniece Williams - Songbird.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Image without license
editUnspecified source/license for File:Pbailey - Love Will Find A Way.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Pbailey - Love Will Find A Way.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}}
(to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 23:45, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 15
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philip Bailey discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love Will Find a Way.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Maurice White- I Need You.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Maurice White- I Need You.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Image without license
editUnspecified source/license for File:Earth, Wind & Fire- My Promise.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Earth, Wind & Fire- My Promise.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}}
(to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 21:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Take Your Time (Do It Right) by SOS Band.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Very similar to the (other) European artwork (File:Take_Your_Time_(Do_It_Right)_-_SOS_Band.jpg). Furthermore, this is the Italian release, not the US one, which used generic company sleeve.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Take Your Time (Do It Right) by SOS Band.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Take Your Time (Do It Right) by SOS Band.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editImage without license
editUnspecified source/license for File:Earth, Wind & Fire - Dance Tracks.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Earth, Wind & Fire - Dance Tracks.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}}
(to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 13:00, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
The article Dance Tracks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
References do not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for music. Article has not been edited since it was tagged for notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whiteguru (talk) 01:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Earth, Wind & Fire - Dance Tracks.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Earth, Wind & Fire - Dance Tracks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 10:20, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Come and Get Yourself Some.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Come and Get Yourself Some.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editOrphaned non-free image File:Sandi Patty - More Than Wonderful.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Sandi Patty - More Than Wonderful.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:All In the Way.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:All In the Way.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:04, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Earth, Wind & Fire- Spread Your Love.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Earth, Wind & Fire- Spread Your Love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:16, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Philip Bailey & Little Richard- Twins.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Philip Bailey & Little Richard- Twins.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
File:EarthWind&Fire - September 99.jpg listed for discussion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:EarthWind&Fire - September 99.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:50, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
The redirect A Soulful Christmas (Brian Culbertson album has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 13 § A Soulful Christmas (Brian Culbertson album until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)