Word dewd544

Welcome!

Hello, Word dewd544, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bearian (talk) 21:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pax Romana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dacian Wars (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi. I guess I purposely linked it to the disambiguation page since both of them could apply, although if I had to chose, I'd use the second one on the main conflict, of course. Word dewd544 (talk) 16:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

December 2018

Hello, I'm FlightTime. Please refrain from changing genres as you did to the page Pink Floyd but you didn't provide a reliable source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. It has been removed and archived in the page history for now.

Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive.

Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:03, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Aw come on man. A lot of other pages don't have references for the genres either though. I mean the band is very often referred to in some of their early songs as space rock, and was even pioneering in that regard. Even the article for space rock on here mentions them. How can it not be listed as that? Why is Wikipedia so weirdly rigid on this issue with some big bands? I've noticed other bands who have lots of inaccurate descriptions in this regard but people don't seem to care... Okay, then I'll get some actual concrete references I guess. Word dewd544 (talk) 16:16, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Great, if they're "very often referred to" then a reliable source should be easy to provide and then consensus is just a thread away, don't you think ? and please review Wikipedia:Other stuff exists. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 16:20, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

The bits about Brian Jones and Peter Green in that sentence I added to that you reverted were also unsourced but they still remained. And Syd Barrett is pretty much the poster boy for "acid casualties" isn't he? Anyway shouldn't the others be removed if they don't have references either? Word dewd544 (talk) 19:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daco-Roman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carpi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Merovingian dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clovis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)