User talk:Worm That Turned/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome!

Hello, Worm That Turned, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 14:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Q&A

That's why I'm here....well that, and to edit Wikipedia. :D Just a forewarning, I have many Wikifriends that patrol my talk page, so if you ask me a question don't be surprised if one of them answers it before I do.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 14:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

For this. I thought all the edits were from the same IP and so rollback would have reverted it all - obviously not, I should have checked. Thanks for fixing! Tombomp (talk/contribs) 09:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Saucy McFoodlefist, Professional?

Woohoo, my first Saucy McFoodlefist comment... glad to know I'm helping -- WORMMЯOW  07:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

You certainly are! Thanks for the encouragement, friend! User:Saucy McFoodlefist

Indeed, you are helping. Sorry for messing up your sig, my phone doesn't support some characters. User:Saucy McFoodlefist, Professional

Don't worry about it, it's my fault for using an unusual character in my sig. -- WORMMЯOW  10:10, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Haha.. just saw your Monty Python reference regarding Storm-Petrels... you are a formidable opponent. I owe you a beer sometime. User:Saucy McFoodlefist, Professional —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.251.213.234 (talk) 09:21, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Beer sounds good! What can I say, I need to occupy my time somehow...-- WORMMЯOW  09:28, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Central College of Commerce AfD

I've responded to your AfD nomination and I've included a bunch of new sources. I hope it convinces you! Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 20:37, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem, my first instinct was delete as well until I googled the college! Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 20:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Man am I using exclamation points (!) a lot or is just me! Sorry! Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 20:24, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Folklore of Discworld.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Folklore of Discworld.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Doom Bar

On February 8, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Doom Bar, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 13:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Death-mini.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Death-mini.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

The Despair Squid

Hi Magnius, I'm a little confused as to why you're pointing the despair squid to Back to Reality. The episode doesn't actually discuss the creature in any way, shape or form, besides mentioning that it exists. I don't see how piping the link is appropriate. I personally don't think it should be linked, but rather the episode title should be. -- WORMMЯOW  14:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

The linking of that episode for the despair squid was not my idea, but it was intended to link back to the episode that the first despair squid appeared in to explain the reference in the episode. I agree that it is probably not the best way to do it, so will endevour to come up with a better way of referencing the past. magnius (talk) 16:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

talkie toaster

The reference to Doctor Who is actually very relevant as a reference to popular culture. 121.209.147.218 (talk) 10:11, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi 121. Have you got a reference for the talkie toaster sounding like a Dalek, as I personally can't see the similarity. Without a valid reference, I do not think it is appropriate to the article as it is Original Research. Don't forget, that the talkie toaster has been appeared in different season and sounded very different in each one. I'm happy to discuss this further -- WORMMЯOW  11:30, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Allusion

Your username is noteworthy

• The smallest worm will turn, being trodden on.

-- William Shakespeare, Henry VI, part 3, Act II, scene ii, line 859.

It inspires acknowledgment, recognition, curiosity, etc. --Tenmei (talk) 13:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Invitation for the typeface collaboration

Requesting editors' help There is currently an oppened collaboration which aims in improving articles related to typefaces and font categorization. If you´re interested in this subject, please visit the collaboration page, add your self and see how you can help.

I hope you can contribute in this section. Happy editings! - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 20:22, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Non Free Images in your User Space

Hey there Worm That Turned, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:Worm That Turned/Sharps. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 04:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Calmer Waters 11:07, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Vote comment

As you commented in the pending closure discussion I am notifying you that the Wikipedia:Pending changes/Vote comment is now open and will be for two weeks, discussion as required can continue on the talkpage. Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 23:36, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

BLP violations

It would be great if we could avoid WP:BLP violations, e.g., unsourced measurements/height/weight/date of birth [1]. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Catherine of Valois

I think the inconsistency I was flagging on this page was something different -- it used to claim both that she did marry Owen Tudor and that it's unknown whether she did or not. But that problem seems to have gone too, so I'm happy that the tag can be removed. Thanks for checking. Mhardcastle (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC).

DYK for Jacques-Barthélemy Micheli du Crest

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Pronoun

Hi,

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pronoun&action=historysubmit&diff=383805206&oldid=383343725

I don't understand that at all. "Position" in what sense? Position amongst the words in the sentence? Position in some hierarchy of parts of speech? If you understand it, which it seems you do, perhaps you would be able to clarify it in the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.35.79 (talk) 13:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

I agree. It doesn't make any sense. I thought it did, but the more I re-read it, the less sense it makes. For now, I've put the flag back, and I'll see if I can re-write the whole thing later. -- WORMMЯOW  08:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Invisible barnstar

Good work on the self-contradictory articles! Rich Farmbrough, 20:17, 9 October 2010 (UTC).

Bolt (2008 film)

Greetings. Please provide a reliable and verifiable source stating that Miley Cyrus' character's name in Bolt is something other than Penny, which is presented both in the movie and in its end credits. Any future attempts to add this information without a source will be considered vandalism and handled accordingly. Thank you. --McDoobAU93 22:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Oops... that'll teach me for editing articles I don't know about... -- WORMMЯOW  07:48, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

It appears you were editing in good faith, so I have no problem putting the past behind us. Ultimately, I'm trying to track down how this mess got started in the first place. Thanks. :) --McDoobAU93 14:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Gladiator screenshot

Thanks for your help with giving me the scene in which the "We who are about to die..." line is spoken. It saved me a lot of time finding it. I just uploaded the file here. Thanks, again. Dismas|^(talk) 05:44, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Re:Kosmische musik

Oh, yes, I did something for that artcle. I remember I was searching for some information about Space rock, Tangerine Dream, Popol Vuh, Hawkwind, Gong, ... but I found nothing until I discovered it in the content of an old version of Kosmische musik and decided to restore it. I don't remember what I did exactly, but I will check out the article history very soon and hope to participate to the discussion. Anyway, I'm here just to say thank you for the advice. I really appreciate it! Cheers. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 15:06, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of HMS Whiting (1812)

Hello! Your submission of HMS Whiting (1812) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 18:56, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your note, you made a good start with it. Moonraker2 (talk) 11:01, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doom Bar

The article Doom Bar you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Doom Bar for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:46, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for HMS Whiting (1812)

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Chile

Hi, just wondering, what is going on there, are you reverting vandalism or have you got citation to support your change? I don't think pending is working very well there, never mind, it looks alright now, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 14:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Doom Bar PR

Glad my comments are helpful. I did not do a line by line review as I figured things would change with a copyedit, plus some newer sources will hopefully turn up more interesting facts. Please ask if you want me to take another look, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 15:59, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

I replied on the PR page as that is linked from the article's talk and everyone can see the comments most easily there. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 15:51, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Clotted Cream

The DYK project (nominate) 06:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

All Day transcription

Thanks for doing the infographic transcription. Gillis just wrote me and he said that he has a timing list, but he has to format it and he does not know when he will have time to deal with it. Since you looked thoroughly at the Fastcompany data, let me know if you learned something about it that I do not know. It seems obvious to me that however they got the track timing data, they did not get it from Wikipedia. I assume they just used Wikipedia as a starting point then independently verified everything they did, but the data is very different and I see no reason to call it a circular reference. Blue Rasberry 17:39, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

No problem, I thought it was a very good solution, and would have been very helpful. I agree there are significant differences (samples missing, others added, second differences here and and there), and they do mention that they did some of their own work. However, they specifically state that they use Mashupbreakdown.com and AllDaySamples.com, both of which specifically cite Wikipedia. It may be that the information has all featured on our page at some point and been removed or changed, but either way there is a clear circular reference.

Hopefully Gillis will publish something so that we can put it up, I've not requested deletion of my FastCompany transcription, as it may be useful in the future if we can use it. Also, Errant's point regarding overkill is a good one, the rest of the article could do with some expansion if we are going to put in such a large track listing.Worm 17:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Assistance request

WormTT, I do need some assistance. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but I don't understand why to leave a message one is supposed to edit the person's talk page. You said to type {{helpme}} at the bottom of your talk page and sign in with four tilda. tdharris (talk) 08:36, 24 December 2010 (UTC)tdharris (talk) 08:38, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for the warm greeting worm, what you sent me will be very helpfull. The cookies look great too. You did I warrent such a welcome? --Paragoalie (talk) 17:14, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Stargazy pie

I fixed a few typos in this article. I'm envious of your ability to quickly précis a mass of refs into a reasonable article, though. Takes me ages :(  —SMALLJIM  17:01, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!!!

Thanks for your welcome friend. See i love Grand Theft Auto IV and that's why I can't see its image going down. The awards won by Gta IV are "Game of the year" awards but they are edited as "Action game of the year" awards. There is a big difference between the two. The reviews are also mostly of PC version instead of PS3/Xbox 360 version which represent the game. So please if you can do anything about it, I would be very grateful to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gta4best (talk • contribs) 17:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi Gta4best, don't forget to sign your posts (you can use four tildas, like this ~~~~ and the software does the rest), so that I know who's writing to me! I too am a big fan of GTAIV, though I largely ignored the article when the game came out due to the debate over Niko's nationality. I'll see what I can do about the awards, though it may take me a few days as I'm going to be offline this weekend, and I'll need to do a little research to make sure the information is correct. Do you have any reliable sources that confirm it was Game of the Year, rather than Action Game of the Year? Worm 17:31, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Gta IV Reliable sources

I am providing you with a link "www.gotypicks.blogspot.com". This site records Game of the year picks of various websites. So when you visit the site, go to "2008" link for 2008 GOTY awards and you will get all the links of Game of the year awards won by GTA IV. That site doesn't have 2 GOTY awards, one of "Electronic Gaming Monthly" and the other of "Atomic Gamer". For these 2 you may search on Google to verify. Thanks friend!!!Gta4best (talk) 18:11, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Mousehole Cat

Hello! Your submission of The Mousehole Cat at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Stargazy pie/GA1

I've offered a (rather lengthy, sorry!) review. Love the article, and I'd love to see it promoted to good (or even featured) article status. J Milburn (talk) 02:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!!!!!!

That blog is obviously not a reliable source by wikipedia standards, but the individual site links on that blog are the reliable sources.Gta4best (talk) 06:15, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Well done for GAs

Hi. Well done for getting Doom Bar (one of my favourite beers too!) through to GA and getting clotted cream and Stargazy pie up to standard for the GA process. Perhaps if we get another article up to GA then we could suggest a Cornish cuisine Good Topic.

With all your great work on these Cornish articles, have you considered joining WikiProject Cornwall? We could use an editor like you and you'll find us a friendly bunch! Cheers, Zangar (talk) 15:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2011 WikiCup!

Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to Wikipedia:WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 14:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

As an aside, any article you have worked on and nominated in 2011 which has passed (such as the GA nomination of stargazey pie) you are fine to claim for. J Milburn (talk) 14:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Stargazy pie

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for The Mousehole Cat

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Antoinette (barque)

The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

GA Bacon ice cream

Did you know ... that your GA nomination for Bacon ice cream has been placed on hold? Racepacket (talk) 22:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations on passing the GA review. Perhaps you can return the favor by reviewing another article from the GAN queue? Racepacket (talk) 19:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi Worm, just wanted to drop you a note to say that my concerns were dealt with at the GA, sorry for not managing to reply before it was promoted - nice work by the way. PS. I like Doom Bar, it tempts me to work on Pig's ear, my favourite brew! SmartSE (talk) 11:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

No it's from Uley in Gloucestershire, although it's namesake gastropub sells it in London apparently. You're right it is cockney rhyming slang for beer as well, not sure if that was intentional or not, since all the breweries beer's have porcine inspired names. Good luck with the FA! SmartSE (talk) 11:40, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

• Congratulations! Great article. Have you made it? It's quite tasty. Drmies (talk) 17:26, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
  • I turned Tomato compote into a bluelink. Your help is appreciated to elevate it from mere stubbiness. What is currently footnote 2, a reference to Busico The chefs of the times, also contains a recipe for Tomato nage which looks absolutely delicious. Drmies (talk) 17:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Online Ambassadors

I saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads (talk) 02:48, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Nuisance editors

Hi "Worm". Thanks for your reply, but not surprisingly (due to lack of information about long ongoing past history) you have been distracted from the point. I am fed up with Danjel. I (and numerous others) have been polite, reasonable, rational, tolerant and civil to him on many occasions. We have all wasted our time - Danjel does not read what has been written, and goes to tortuos efforts to avoid anything relevant that does not match his own view of the world. I want nothing to do with him. I want him to get out of my life, and stay out of my life. Permanently.

Hence, I will ask again: "What are my options with respect to a nuisance editor who repeatedly places "stuff" on my talk page despite repeated requests for him not to, and despite repeated statements that he is not welcome here?"

Thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 14:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

OK.

I really have to thank you for your efforts. You've gone a long way out of your way over this, and I admire your persistence.

If, for some reason, you ever decide you want to be an admin, drop a note on my talk page and I'd be happy to contribute a "reference".

You keep up the good work, and I'll remove what's-his-name from my memory. Thanks, and best wishes, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:15, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

In regards to Pdfpdf's and my history, these are the specific interactions where Pdfpdf claims that he has been polite, etc. and that I have ignored his concerns

1. [[2]] - you will note that I objected to the insinuation that my admission of not personally knowing about 3 unrelated schools was the basis for an argument against the proposal I put;
2. My reversions [[3]], [[4]] and [[5]] in regards to refactoring his attempts to belittle my objections to his (and another user's) uncivil comments (for example the above) and to use {{hidden}} to hide the reason why I abandoned my proposal, i.e., his uncivil comments.
3. His flippant comments such as [[6]]

"Avoiding anything relevant" apparently means that I object strenuously to uncivil behaviour and unilateral refactoring. Yes, absolutely. That's me. -danjel (talk to me) 15:37, 21 January 2011 (UTC)