Worvulgang808

February 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Sopranos. Mlpearc (open channel) 16:12, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Warning

You are hereby informed to stay off my talk page. One more message and you will explain yourself at WP:ANI. Sundayclose (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ⁓ Hello71 16:01, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

It is apparent that you have not made the slightest effort to locate the discussion. Clicking on "speedy renaming section" and then searching for "Science fiction adventure films" easily locates the discussion section. ⁓ Hello71 16:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2. Elizium23 (talk) 17:08, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Try reading WP:CATDEF. For a cat to be added to an article it must have reliably sourced info in the article to support it. So far none of the article that you have been adding cats to meet that requirement. Ignoring this is a hallmark of the editing that you have done here. MarnetteD|Talk 20:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 20:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. MarnetteD|Talk 20:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Host (2013 film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MarnetteD|Talk 21:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. MarnetteD|Talk 21:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   —SMALLJIM  21:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)