Your submission at Articles for creation: JustFix (November 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Royiswariii was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Royiswariii Talk! 02:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Wysteria777! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Royiswariii Talk! 02:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: JustFix (November 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 11:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

November 2024

edit
 

Hello Wysteria777. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wysteria777. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Wysteria777|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 11:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I am not being compensated directly or indirectly for my edits.
Thanks. Wysteria777 (talk) 15:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
But what is your connection to Adam Graham? Every edit you have made (including the one in 2017) have been to promote him or his company. --bonadea contributions talk 15:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
None of the edits are promotional. They are all factual, objective and referenced. I have no connection to him. I have been following his career for some time and noticed that there were some inaccuracies that would benefit from clarification. Wysteria777 (talk) 16:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:JustFix logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:JustFix logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply