Your submission at Articles for creation: Jucika (May 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lovkal was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~ lovkal (talk) 11:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hey Lovkal, I'm glad you find the subject interesting! I heard about it from a post I found, and wanted more people to know about it. I also noticed that you added alot of Hungarian sources, and even a whole history section that I had not known about. Should I submit the draft as is, since there are now 9 sources and more information, or should I keep searching for more sources, on other wikipedias? XanderK09 (talk) 13:20, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

::@XanderK09 Some more information was my thought, but I see you've already done that. Nice. Submit it and I can accept it and we'll let it grow from there also! ~ lovkal (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Lovkal Thank you so much! This is my first Wikipedia article, I'm so glad you want to accept it!! Submitting it now, thanks again! XanderK09 (talk) 00:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, XanderK09! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ lovkal (talk) 11:35, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jucika has been accepted

edit
 
Jucika, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ lovkal (talk) 09:55, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: ENA (web series) (July 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Steve Cash (Youtuber, Musician) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Cash (Youtuber, Musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Cash (Youtuber, Musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:XanderK09/ENA(web series)

edit

  Hello, XanderK09. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:XanderK09/ENA(web series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply