User talk:Xaosflux/UBX/User religion flying spaghetti monster not really

(Incidentally, Flying Spaghetti Monsterism is not more likely than Creationism. That's the point entirely: FSM and Creationism are both so incredibly unlikely that even though they're both possible, and even though Creationism is more likely than FSM, they're still both such distant possibilities and so unsubstantiated by any facts whatsoever that they lack any scientific validity whatsoever. I'd think it would be possible to make that point without making a false claim that FSM is more likely than it is, which just undermines your own arguments (the point of FSM is to be excessively absurd and thus point out Creationism's absurdities and arbitrary nature, not to be less absurd than Creationism while still being quite odd). But it's your template, so I won't change the intent. -Silence 17:41, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Bollocks. --Victim of signature fascism | help remove biblecruft 23:10, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

I'd say a better wording for it would be something like, "this user believes in the Flying Spaghetti Monster, because it makes more sense than Intelligent Design." Janizary 01:18, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

FSM accounts for inconsistancies that regular creation doesn't, such as why everything appears alot older than it really is. Small things like that are why its more likely.--Thenormalyears 20:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)