Welcome!

edit

Hello, Xareen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Aliwiki (talk) 13:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply


Hello

edit

Salaam Xareen. I am seeing your valuable contributions and since you are new, don't hesitate to contact me for any problem or questions. Regards, --Aliwiki (talk) 11:57, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

AliWiki. I am completely new to the Wikipedia. I will let you know if I need anything. Thanks for offering. At the moment, I am just going around adding references to articles. I am also adding contents only if the articles can be improved. Please feel free to suggest me articles that you think I can contribute. Xareen (talk) 20:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Good brother, we need valuable users like you. I gave links of two articles on the talk page of Imam Jafar (AS) article. I'll semi-active during Xmas vacations, but after that I will help you in improving the articles. Also add important articles to your watchlist, so you'll be able to check them about possible vandalism or any disruptive edits. Thanks, --Aliwiki (talk) 17:30, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:43, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

January 2012

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Criticism of Twelver Shi'ism shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. As promised on talk page. I hope I won't have to return here. Drmies (talk) 04:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. When you recently edited Kitab al-Kafi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aql and Iman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

In response to your feedback

edit

Xareen, thanks for your response. Administrators are helpful, in such case we only have around 1,500 admins and there are not enough of them to resolve edit warring. However, they do their best to resolve this problem. Also, admins are professional (in terms of contributing) and are able to resolve edit warring, like what I have said above. Have a nice day and God bless!

Jedd Raynier (talk) 09:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

I thank you for leaving nice words of encouragement on my talk page. Warm and friendly words like this makes me want to continue writing and contributing on Wikipedia. Although your explanation is not perfect and sounds a bit defensive, but I completely understand how chaotic this place can be and you are short of staffs to handle every users request. Probably I expected too much out of you guys. My mistake. Anyway, your words have made me feel much better and I am going to continue to contribute. Thank you for your message.Xareen (talk) 17:39, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Xareen. You have new messages at Salvio giuliano's talk page.
Message added 10:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

In response to your feedback

edit

Since the rules often contradict each other, what matters is rarely what they say but rather who can support you if you ever where to be banned.

But not sure if you are talking about the policies or something else. Anyways, enjoy your stay!

Juice Leskinen 22:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Zahiri madhhab

edit

Thank you so much for letting me know about that book on the talk page for the Zahiri article. Translating all the Arabic source info myself would be a great mess; this book will hopefully make things much easier. May I ask how you found out about it? MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:03, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply