Xomiaciok

Unspecified source for Image:NATALIA.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NATALIA.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 03:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Natalia Ivashkevitch

A tag has been placed on Natalia Ivashkevitch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 15:17, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Putting {{hangon}} here accomplishes nothing to save whatever article you wanted kept. GRBerry 21:11, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Natalia ivashkevitch

A tag has been placed on Natalia ivashkevitch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Quanticle (talk) 19:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

The article Avian x has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please do not continue to add articles about non-notable people or projects. Wikipedia is not the place to publicise music. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:41, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for your question. There are two relevant Wikipedia rules applying to your deleted articles. One is that Wikipedia must not be used for promotion and advertising. That means an article must be entirely factual and neutral; it must neither praise not attack the subject.

The second rules is Wikipedia:Notability. This means that a subject deserves a Wikipedia article only if they are already well-known. There are specific rules, some of which can be found here. It is also open the the communities decision, but if the subject is not at least as notable as laid down there, an article is almost never allowed. It is clear from what you have written that Natalia Ivashkevitch is nowhere near notable enough to deserve a Wikipedia article. I recommend waiting until she has become much better known and then writing an article about her.

If you want to reply, please do so here. I will see it. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

............................. Thank you for the reply! Appreciate it.I hope this is a right place to post... Would you be so kind and let me know what makes this band notable then ? I am just confused....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Medic_Droid

Xomiaciok (talk) 16:55, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

December 2010

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Avian x has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)