YBO
YBO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
not a sockpuppet because ID obvious from contribution history. Report on insufficient spelled Afd argumentation will be transfered to mediation immediately. This is not a blocking reason.
Decline reason:
You used this sock in the same places as your other account, even if it is generally clear to see that it is the same user it can cause confusion and block evasions.--Konstable 15:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
YBO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Blocks that may be controversial are:
blocks of suspected "sock puppets" or "reincarnations" of banned users
blocks of logged-in users with a substantial history of valid contributions, regardless of the reasoning for the block
infinite block (IP) not appreciate.
Decline reason:
Looking at your contributions, we see you've paid a lot of attention to this other user's userpage. I'm not sure what you're up to, but please stick to one account. --Luna Santin 20:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
File:Crystal 128 gadu.png Welcome, YBO!
Hello, YBO, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Redvers, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article- File:Crystal Clear app kate.png Manual of Style
Fun stuff...
{{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Why the account change?
editSo, what's with the sudden obvious name change? --tjstrf 21:51, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- It is a more strong expression. I do not utilize the other ID's for edit action. User:YBO 22:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well, i do not really understand this. It is too long. User_talk:Yy-bo/notaskedfor_1. It happened before to User_talk:Akidd_dublin. I do not see a meaningful article edit, just pages of nonsense-talk. This requires an enclosing statement, by the way of arbitration. Actually i am blocked to put it to arbitration, one subject a time. User:YBO 15:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry
editYou appear to be in violation of WP:SOCK, specifically Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#Avoiding_scrutiny_from_other_editors. BigE1977 22:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- The interest is not legitimate. Argumentation: Talk about talk, trolling, flaming and spamming on purpose. User:YBO 22:25, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- I don't believe he is in violation of WP:SOCK. He appears to only be changing his user name. He is linking on User:YBO to all his old subpages. He has also edited his old user page from this account. This would not appear to be the actions of someone trying to avoid scrutiny from other editors. David D. (Talk) 23:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- On the other hand it would not be the actions one would expect from a user switching accounts. Possibly he will use one account for AfD purpose only and this one for editing articles? I think that is probably acceptable under WP:SOCK regulations. David D. (Talk) 23:02, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- There have been other reasons than to superimpose a more correct english. Probably i will use Yy-bo for Afd, if it is appreciate. It is a good idea to read the policies more carefully before another bulk Afd session. User:YBO 23:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- On the other hand it would not be the actions one would expect from a user switching accounts. Possibly he will use one account for AfD purpose only and this one for editing articles? I think that is probably acceptable under WP:SOCK regulations. David D. (Talk) 23:02, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Please note. If you do any further reverts to that page you will be in violation of WP:3RR. You do not need to create an article about "Melting oven". There is already an article about what you seem to be referring to. See Furnace#Metallurgical_furnaces. BigE1977 23:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- I won't revert against 3RR. It is not unthinkable to redirect Melting oven to that article? Otherwise i fully agree the explanation. User:Yy-bo 23:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
New Category
editI am confused about the category "Red-Haired Kings". While it is amusing, it seems somewhat irrelevant.Michaelbusch 02:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
email sent to admin, copy here:
editThe block of YBO is ignoring the information on the talk page of user YBO. A request for mediation/advocacy on Afd spelling is not possible. The goal is an enclosure statement the Afd spellings (1) and (2) are not sufficient and no good example. User Yy-bo (now YBO) has been right to ask for arbitration, because the spelling is based on personal POV, not wikipedia policy WP. The mediation/advocacy will only be about the Afd spellings (1), (2), no other subjects. If this turns out to be sufficient, there won't be additional mediation/advocacy requests, or requests for comment. This has been inserted into the user talk of YBO (email sent).
- I want to use this account. It is unfortunate to have it labelled a puppet. User:YBO 15:34, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Anyway i will file arbitration (for the Afd spelling (1), (2) of a defined user, as soon as possible. User:YBO 15:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
I am defintively not a girl (whatever song titles) 1
editI am now using this so-called sock, to try around with the usage of english language, especially british english.
favour (british), color (american) ? I don't know, but usually they use color, not colour. I am not even sure about this.
I am defintively not a girl (whatever song titles) 2
edit- User:Yy-bo/AFD_save/Erlan_Alimov
- Erlan_Alimov
- Nikolai_Pokotylo - not deleted (probably more noteable).
Previously, i have called the thing wikipedia 1.0
However, wikipedia 2.0 is not thinkable unless it is introduced.
Addding various links, they have been considered to improve the encyclopedia, not to threaten unknown wikipedia users.
In a few cases i have restored the links, a so called revert.
It has been explained to me, adding links to own sites is called VANITY.
I do not know if i am better off to employ a commercial service, which is ruled by economy and success,
not by wrestling with invisible minor age young adults.
At least i have spent 20 or 30 hours with long discussions.
However, i have not been situated to accept defeat (removal of articles).
The result is an infinite IP block.
Wikipedia, especially after cleaning the user box system, is still considered an interesting project by me.
However, it is neither a hobby, nor a matter to profile personally.
If my external links are explored, this is good. They have not been included to be used
for argumentation about my personality within technical discussion.
Indeed i am very afraid of personal statements, to call names, id's, for instance while using a weblog.
The same thing is expected in return.
If the level of my english is continutated called insufficient, i must refrain from more suchlike practice.
But guess, without reference to usage of weak english by others, the events are caused by:
Being upset with the personal details found into my various external site.
I wrote about it (without using the word wikipedia) using YAHOO 360 weblog.
It is like country music compilations:
- 2 songs are good
- 3 other songs are noteable
- the 45 others are not played very much
Don't you agree.
I will continue to write nonsense into my weblog, without getting personal, primitive and not to provide a constructive solution.
Wikipedia 1.0 has become Wikipedia 1.1 (new userboxes).
However, the policies are too much used for the sake of it.
- Articles are too long.
- They are pretty much written from one point of view, once they obtained a certain length, they can not be edited anymore (without pre-requisite like external chat)
- Spin-offs are not tolerated. Have a look a real shop: There are twenty books about mathematics. The customer has the choice. Not everyone wants formula scrolling.
- Link policies are unrealistic strict.
- Vanity guidelines are not applied narrow enough. Lots of articles are in the need to be outsourced (WikiRecords, WikiMovies, WikiPeople etc.) - Only major records, films, people are encyclopedic
It is not/It has not been possible to discuss these matters with, at times, sorry, community members with babaric and rude manners.
- Guess the english might be a bit fallacious, but language barrier? It is insulting, somehow.
Hope this gets unblocked, and this gets read. If you do not understand it, then i don't mind, i believe it to be understandable.
I am not from russia.
See also
edit- Cocacolonisation (Afd by me, few 100 hits, people decided to keep it)
- Ghey (My article, Akidd_dublin, gaming slang, Afd->deletion->review (by me)->Redirect to dictionary.
It is not about the orientation, but lameness of a few things. It is also possible to use it in a friendly way. But the Duudlees of Harry Potter are not ghey. Probably they are pretty much uberghey, but they are not a gaming subject. And this variant is frowned upon. Have i put it to another persons user talk. No.
- I believe i was right to defend this article. 500,000 hits are more than just not noteable. It is called internet phenomen.
- I am self-righteous, defending a point of view, and this comment is also an advert for various things. I make no clue out of the fact to be a NIKE consumer, without hotlinking to it all the times. I understand this is not being asked for. Thank you.
- Because coca-cola is so much sugar based, i am also a confessing consumer of tea, green tea and coffe.
- If you can not use chopsticks, then it is my advantage. I can, because i wanted to.
- if i get unblocked, maybe i create a new policy, based on martial arts rules. There is already WP:CIVIL, but people underride it by expressing friendly-formulated concerns, and spells of appreciation. It must be explained in the words of Joe_Public.
- I can do it, at least i believe i can do it. However, i do not rely on wikipedia as the single source of information. Even if i would be sorry to see it stay a paper-style encyclopedia, Original research banned or not banned. At least they should be allowed to link to external wiki sites, if they are suitable. It is not allowed right now. Efforts to create a tiny science spin-off have been criminalized, when i tried to defend my article, and caled low-quality. Sure i am not an expert of the subject. But i believe this is not right, policies or not. It does not make sense to do it alone (to create an article spin-off). It requires a community like wikipedia. But what happens. It gets deleted by, people without real interest in the subject, just to play wannabe-general, coming from what. Policy No. 2: Wikipedia is not a place to apply personal skills of discipline.
This has been written down without thinking about it. If it sucks, then it sucks. But i do not think so. Fallacious english or not. I do not have to buy you everything you want. If you are given the opportunity to spell it. You can use this document within the spirit of GDFL. User:YBO 20:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- An article which is not really good: Personal Computer. Why: It covers historical computers. I would like to see articles: Traditional_Personal_Computer, Personal Computer only covering ATX and upwards. Someone with a personal favour for the subject must do it (someone who likes personal computers). A machine revolutionist (pc usage) must not do it. User:YBO 21:00, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Result on Cocacolonisation
editTalk:Cocacolonization - not encyclopedic as it looks, transfered to wiktionary (however they had an entry for it long ago). I have been discredited heavily by attacking the article back then. (User:Akidd_dublin - Argumentation was: I would only have nominated it in a harrassing return of the deletion of Ghey. I feel being obfuscated with loads of confusion, just because i have clue enough to contest dubious articles. These are not long articls, if the author asks me to keep the article. But tiny, annoying, unncessary articles. However, i must spell a sufficient Afd nomination, based on Polices, i must include links to the polices. And i must not refer to identities which do not exist, maybe only in a personal perception, maybe Cocacolonisation is as noteable as History_of_CocaCola_labels, already covered by Coca_Cola and Label. Note this is not a sufficient Afd nomination, and must be contested.
Result
editArticle gone, transwikified, already has been a wiktionary entry. By the way i categorized the article to Cola, Portmanteau. If you mix Fanta and Cola, this is pretty much a fine portmanteau. I must not use this suggestion in discussion, making a choice for others, advert etc. I am so sorry for writing soo much on talk pages. User:YBO 21:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- By the way an older version of the article has been transwikified, not the last version of the article. The transfered version uses giant instead of multinational concern. Interesting edit history. User:YBO 21:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- At the time of deletion review: 416,000
- Right now: 687,000
I fully understand it is only an internet phenomena, gaming slang, and there is not encyclopedic ghey culture, like ghey advertsing (adverts for products which are not really required). Even if so, i understand, it is a dictionary definition, at least for now. User:Yy-bo 21:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
I have mentioned wikipedia into one of my weblog/BBS
edithttp://uk.blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-orlfv9I_cq041W.Y7BWIIjw1PTo-?cq=1&p=43
the weblog content is (c) all rights reserved, unless stated otherwise, or figuring a resonable public interest (not a distribution of private details)
hope you consider it:
- professional
- suitable for the image of wikipedia
The post is about a Kazachstan TV SHOW pop-music contest, link found on wikipedia.
NO TEENIE BOPPERS ALLOWED
editSAVE THE NET FROM TEENIE BOPPERS
TEENIE BOPPERS ARE A GREAT DANGERS
TEENIE BOPPERS, NOT THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE
american slang expression directed at pop-up adverts.
External link
edithttp://uk.blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-orlfv9I_cq041W.Y7BWIIjw1PTo-?cq=1&p=45