YaJean

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorado Design Automation (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dorado Design Automation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dorado Design Automation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:54, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, YaJean! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:54, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorado Design Automation (July 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DGG was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

DGG ( talk ) 07:58, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dorado Design Automation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dorado Design Automation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JamesG5 (talk) 03:58, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dorado Design Automation

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Dorado Design Automation has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to be about a company, corporation or organization that did not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SmartSE (talk) 15:57, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Hello YaJean. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:YaJean. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=YaJean|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 15:58, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

—— Hello SmartSE, thank you for the information and the kind message. I understand the Wikipedia policy about trying to avoid paid article indeed, but in fact, I do won’t get any payment from anyone. I am just kind of confused and upset about why my first article was regarded as a paid article since I only provide the common information about this company.

As for the notability problem, I was told that the links I attached before didn’t work for Wikipedia through Wikipedia live chat room , so I change a lots of them, also the reliable sources, like the academic journal.

Apologize for any inconvenience caused. I am just a person who trying to provide the fair information like you, and every decent people on Wikipedia.

I would be very grateful if you would like to give me a hint how could I improve the article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by YaJean (talk • contribs) 18:40, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi YaJean. Thank you for confirming you are not paid. The article was deleted for the same reason as in July - that the article did not explain why the company is significant enough to merit an encyclopedia article about it. The question about whether you were paid is a separate one and didn't influence the deletion. Relatively few companies are sufficiently famous to deserve an article here and to be kept in the long term, a company needs to meet the criteria set out in our notability guideline. Put simply, this means that people independent of the company need to have written about it in depth on multiple occasions. From my own searches now, the company is very far from meeting these requirements and no amount of rewriting can change that. My advice is to find something else to write about. SmartSE (talk) 21:50, 12 August 2019 (UTC)