Yadayadayaday

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Yadayadayaday! I am Kiwiteen123 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

kiwiteen123 (talk) 02:55, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Pmulcahy.com

Just wanted to give you a heads up about this site - it's meant to be a manual for a role-playing game called Twilight 2000. It's probably best not to use it as an actual reference. While much of the information is correct, it's often mixed with fictional information for the purpose of the game, so can't be considered a good/reliable source for anything but Twilight 2000 articles. - Jonathon A H (talk) 02:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Just noticed that you're continuing to use pmulcahy.com as a reference. Again this is not a valid reference for real-world weapons. Although much of the information may be accurate, it is mixed with fictional material to support the game. Using it as a valid reference potentially undermines the content of a legitimate article. Also, the Land Defense Pistol referred to a specific gun - the Kommando LDP. An article already exists for this weapon, so I converted the page you created into a redirect page. - Jonathon A H (talk) 18:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Cal. .30 for Thompson Carbine

Hello Yadayadayaday ! Please give a reliable source for cal. .30 Carbine which you included for Thompson Carbine. I did some research and found nothing concerning .30 cal. Other calibers for Thomson SMB which proved with reliable sources were .45 Remington-Thompson and .45 automatic Peters-Thompson Shot cartridge. Regards --Gruß Tom (talk) 22:41, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Redirects

Just to let you know, in order to create a redirect you need need to put a '#' in front of the 'REDIRECT'. I noticed you're creating quite a few so I thought I might let you know. Xenocide^{Talk|Contributions} 16:47, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Category:Ossetian military personnel

Is up for speedy deletion. Polargeo (talk) 10:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Enfauser

The article Enfauser has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources provided. I had a look and can only find forums/blogs and people who want to sell one. This might well be a hoax.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 217.235.14.163 (talk) 07:35, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Policeman submachine gun

The article Policeman submachine gun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced since 3 years. No sources on Internet or elswere seem to exist.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrunkSquirrel (talk) 02:01, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BARZ

The article BARZ has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, unverifiable, possible hoax.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrunkSquirrel (talk) 22:27, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shkval (rifle)

The article Shkval (rifle) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG - no WP:RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ansh666 06:08, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Grad assault rifle

The article Grad assault rifle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG - no WP:RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ansh666 06:09, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Grad assault rifle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grad assault rifle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grad assault rifle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ansh666 23:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Shkval (rifle) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shkval (rifle) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shkval (rifle) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ansh666 23:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of AO-222 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AO-222 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AO-222 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Someone not using his real name (talk) 22:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of LAPA SM-03

The article LAPA SM-03 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG - no WP:RS detectable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrunkSquirrel (talk) 02:30, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Rheinmetall RH-70 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rheinmetall RH-70 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rheinmetall RH-70 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 06:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Varan PMX-80 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Varan PMX-80 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varan PMX-80 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 07:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Patria Mod 2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patria Mod 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patria Mod 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 07:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Yarará Parachute Knife for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yarará Parachute Knife is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yarará Parachute Knife until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 07:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Maschinenpistole IX. Parteitag for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maschinenpistole IX. Parteitag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maschinenpistole IX. Parteitag until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 07:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Rung Paisarn RPS-001 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rung Paisarn RPS-001 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rung Paisarn RPS-001 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 07:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Northwood R-76 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Northwood R-76 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwood R-76 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 07:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Nikonov NA-2 and NA-4 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikonov NA-2 and NA-4 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikonov NA-2 and NA-4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 07:32, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Alpha GPI for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alpha GPI is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha GPI until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 07:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of MPA submachine gun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MPA submachine gun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MPA submachine gun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 08:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of ENARM SMG for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ENARM SMG is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ENARM SMG until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 08:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of BSM/9 M1 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BSM/9 M1 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BSM/9 M1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 08:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of CEV M9M1 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CEV M9M1 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CEV M9M1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 08:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Hamilton mod. 1901 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamilton mod. 1901 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamilton mod. 1901 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 08:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Mekanika Uirapuru for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mekanika Uirapuru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mekanika Uirapuru until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 08:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Hafdasa C-4 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hafdasa C-4 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hafdasa C-4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 17:59, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of SM-9 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SM-9 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SM-9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 04:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Enfield TC-10 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enfield TC-10 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enfield TC-10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo (talk) 00:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)