User talk:YellowMonkey/Archive6
Master of Puppets has bopped you with a mop! Bops promote not only WikiLove, but also steady loss of brain cells! Hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the Moppage by bopping someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, and help the chief MoP achieve his goal of world domination. Happy editing! Master of Puppets Your will is mine. 01:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your vote on my RfA. Unfortunately there was no consensus reached at 43 support, 18 oppose and 8 neutral. I've just found out that there is a feature in "my preferences" that forces me to use edit summaries. I've now got it enabled :) Thanks again. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 15:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
VandalProof 1.2 Now Available
editAfter a lenghty, but much-needed Wikibreak, I'm happy to announce that version 1.2 of VandalProof is now available for download! Beyond fixing some of the most obnoxious bugs, like the persistent crash on start-up that many have experienced, version 1.2 also offers a wide variety of new features, including a stub-sorter, a global user whitelist and blacklist, navigational controls, and greater customization. You can find a full list of the new features here. While I believe this release to be a significant improvement over the last, it's nonetheless nowhere near the end of the line for VandalProof. Thanks to Rob Church, I now have an account on test.wikipedia.org with SysOp rights and have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my simple history merge tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your suggestions for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing! --AmiDaniel (talk) 02:08, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
And the hits just keep coming! !!!
editthat subject seemed fitting... ++Lar: t/c 02:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Your suggestion at DYK
editThanks Blnguyen, I am still learning the ropes. I'd like to make a proposal at Talk:DYK to create a box for the next DYK. Since it won't directly affect the Main Page, its contents won't be as sensitive so there is no need to protect it. We could start populating it earlier and more people would be able to collaborate. ←Humus sapiens ну? 03:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, go to Wikipedia talk:Did you know to try and instigate new policies and procedure. Hopefully, this time next week, I can help to keep DYK running smoothly. I think the more articles which get a run on DYK the better, as it keeps up community morale, which is vital to the ongoing success of the project.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! - review me 03:28, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
A Master dedicated to the cause of the Human Being
editI really appreciate the contents that you guys have contributed to other articles of Wikipedia, the Open Source Encyclopedia. I really acknowledge the hard works that you've been doing to make the encyclopedia a rich source of knowledge. In fact, I am also a strong advocate of Open Source, and GNU Free Documentation.
As far as I know, The Supreme Master Ching Hai has always been a pacificist trying to spread the message of Truth and Virtue all over the world through her teachings that are meant to bring mankind towards the realization of God and Truth. I know the many so called "Masters" out there, but not a real one like the Supreme Master.
Those baseless criticisms, that are published by the so called "cultists" do not sound a good Gift for such a Holy person.
Anyway guys, is there a person on Earth who is totally flawless, and does not have any dark side? If there is so, please do tell me. Don't you have done anything wrong in your whole life? What if someone characterizes you wrongly for the things that you've not even done?
Posted by: ldp_linux10:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Replied on talk page.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:50, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Note: I have cut of the last half of the message, which was a religious extolment of Suma Ching Hai. It is on the reply on Ldp Linux's talk page.
Happy Birthday!
editHope it's a good one. --Pilot|guy 01:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Happy Birthday! Well looks like you might get a great Wiki-present today, WP:100 on your RFA! Cheers. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 03:36, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Happy Birthday Blnguyen! Enjoy the day. michael talk 04:54, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Belated birthday wishes from me. Happy belated birthday! Hope you enjoyed your birthday. --Terence Ong 12:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Bl, you added 'Michael Wilson (Australian politician), member of the South Australian House of Assembly, 1977-1985' to this disambig page. Although I'm heading over to Parliament House and the State Library tomorrow to do some research on my current article-in-progress, is there any chance you could tell me what his electoral district was (if you have access to such material)? I've got a feeling he was a notable Transport Minister. michael talk 05:20, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- I think that's my man. Thanks! michael talk 05:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
editSteveo2 10:52, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- "Happy birthday" from me too. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 10:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- And from me, wikitwin! Thanks for your b'day wishes to me. ➨ ≡ЯΞDVΞRS≡ 21:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Wish you a very happy b'day. Adminship will be a belated birtday gift from wikipedians. - Aksi_great (talk) 21:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- And from me, wikitwin! Thanks for your b'day wishes to me. ➨ ≡ЯΞDVΞRS≡ 21:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup!
editThank you, YellowMonkey/Archive6! Thank you for voting for my recent RfA, which passed (to my extreme surprise and shock) with a total tally of 66/15/2. For that, I would like to thank you and offer a helping hand in any admin-related tasks that may be required -- it's as simple as leaving a message on my talkpage. Thanks again! -→Buchanan-Hermit™/!? 22:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC) |
Hello Blnguyen! Thank you very much for your support at my request for adminship. Don't worry, I'll get around to supporting yours sooner or later. :o) Thanks again, and if you ever see anything I could be doing better, feel free to leave me a message. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 02:06, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
HQITWS
editI noticed you placed an answer to the "math question" on my quiz section on my user page. Thanks for finding my quiz page, however, the answer needs to be placed on my talk page as the rules state. Not to sound rude, (but rather as a kinda joke), but if you're a student at a university on a high topic, I would have guessed you for one who could read rules... ;) Anyway, thanks for trying, try again. The more the merrier! Spawn Man 02:41, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Re: Happy Birthday
editBInguyen.
Thanks for the well wishing.
(^'-')^ Covington 12:19, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
And thanks from me too! (and Happy Birthday to you, because, from memory, wasn't yours on the 23rd?) -- PageantUpdater 22:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Status
editThank you for your support! (And happy belated birthday, apparently.) --Merovingian {T C @} 00:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC) PS. The thought of me having a "legacy" is... peculiar.
Unblock request I HAVE BEEN AUTOBLOCKED
edit{{unblock|}} I've notified Snotty. michael talk 03:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks Michael.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Michael, AYArktos is currently online, can you message her please? Thanks, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed? Snottygobble 04:01, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to have worked.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- It seems to have worked now. Thanks.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, don't know what I was thinking. Initially I unblocked you instead of your IP. Snottygobble 04:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- You're welcome. My apologies for the initial autoblock by the way. Snottygobble 04:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Nah, that's allright. Being vandalised is a bit of an honour, in some ways, so I don't mind it too much.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, don't know what I was thinking. Initially I unblocked you instead of your IP. Snottygobble 04:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- It seems to have worked now. Thanks.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to have worked.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed? Snottygobble 04:01, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hi Michael, AYArktos is currently online, can you message her please? Thanks, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
F1 portal featured article
editThe F1 portal (in which I assume you have some degree of interest, as your name is listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject_Formula_One) is intended to have a regular rotation of a 'featured article'. I've swapped a few in and out over the last couple of months, but I think it would be better if there were more of a community attempt at deciding this, proposals, votes, that kind of thing. So - why not pop over to Portal_talk:Formula_One#Suggestions_for_Featured_Article: and make a suggestion. Ta. 4u1e 00:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for noticing
editHi Blnguyen
You are obviously very observant! - Thanks for noticing that I was back and also for the "Links for Wikipedians interested in India content" - I shall have a look at that soon, I hope!! Best wishes,--Hari Singh 01:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
I HAVE BEEN AUTOBLOCKED
edit{{unblock}}Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, I'm guessing a few undergrads at the University of Adelaide know that I have a WP account. Most likely they are disgruntled first year students from a physics laboratory class that I am instructing. If all they are going to do is target me personally, then I can live with that. If any admin is going to block them, then unautoblock the IP address please. Else, I don't really care if they only target me personally.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- I've notified Scott. michael talk 03:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. I think you should notify User:Petaholmes. She is online atm.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Done. michael talk 03:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- If remembered right and you're in Sydney, the block should be lifted.--Peta 03:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- I'm in Adelaide at Adelaide University, so you have to lift the IP 192.43.227.18. Thanks.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:38, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Whoops! Should be good to go now.--Peta 03:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks Peta.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- No problem.--Peta 03:43, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- No worries, BL. I just look forward to the honour of being unblocked by yourself when you get your admin powers! michael talk 03:47, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks Peta.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- If remembered right and you're in Sydney, the block should be lifted.--Peta 03:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Done. michael talk 03:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. I think you should notify User:Petaholmes. She is online atm.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 03:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
The Vandal
editHey Blnguyen. I recommend punching him the next time you see him ;-) I noticed that situation a little while ago. I think he was going through some kind of history page or log and was nominating every page you ever created and was placing them up for deletion on AFD. Me and Zzyzx11 notivced this and he deleted them all considering the nomination were in bad-faith. DGX 04:01, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- I would say none considering his nomination statement:
- nn such and such. Cruft created by User:Blnguyen. -- User:Somebodysomebody
- I don't think he's gonna get on the right side of consensus. ;-) DGX 04:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, all 12 that were created before I applied the block said:
- nn cruft by famous cruft-merchant User:Blnguyen. -- Nobodynobody
- So it was not too hard to figure out what that person was doing. One of the pages I deleted was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spherical model, [1] so I would not be surprised if the user who created that page again is the same person. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, all 12 that were created before I applied the block said:
And another vandal
editYou're welcome ... looked like a common type of trolling; usually it's best just to swat those kind without comment. Cheers! Antandrus (talk) 04:36, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Really?
editI'm surprised they are on AfD from a cursory glance. Let me take a look. --HappyCamper 06:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I decided to close them early. Blimey, you've got a tremendous edit count here! Are you a statistical mechanics fan as well? Some activity going on at microcanonical ensemble and canonical ensemble lately. I would like to add more material - I have quite a bit actually, but this seems to to be holding me back of late. Cheers! --HappyCamper 07:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Re: Birthday
editThanks! Now I get to spread the celebrations out. :) -- Natalya 11:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar!
editTone's RfA thanks
editHi BInguyen, as you were the original prod'er of this article I thought you'd like to know its ben de-prodded, so I have opened an AfD on it. You might like to contribute to the discussion. All the best, Gwernol 00:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
A quick thanks
editThanks for bringing the Australian Wikipedians noticeboard to my attention. I have been making small edits to wikipedia for about a year and have only recently fired up an account in order to make larger contributions. I'm still earning the ropes but enjoy updating and clarifiying articles of interest to me. These include articles on Australian history, literature, science (I'm a geologist) and entertainment. Ta ! -bernie_bernbaum 12:59, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
RfA
editI notcied that you've left messages for Zappa.jake on his talk page, so I thought you mihgt want to vote in his RfA at WP:RFA. ShortJason 15:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- I apologize for ShortJason's advertising. Normally most people consider it unacceptable to advertise RfAs (Requests for Adminship) on people's talk pages. I have asked him to stop here. Regardless, now that it's here, if you do wish to vote, do so here. Sorry, zappa.jake (talk) 19:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Re: Wikihalo nomination
editDear Blnguyen, I'm touched by the wikihalo nomination; you are too kind. :) If there's anything I can do for you, please let me know. Regards, Sango123 (e) 20:28, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Featured List
editHi Blnguyen. I'm wondering if you can review List of U.S. states and their state flower, tree, and bird to see if it's fit for Featured List status. Thanks in advance! G.He 01:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind. Unfortunately, that list was redundant. :( G.He 03:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Concordia newsletter
editConcordia Newsletter
Community Justice is no more. It has been reformed to Concordia. Membership has been transferred.
Concordia is an organization of editors on Wikipedia that strive to encourage civility and fair treatment among all editors in the Wikipedian community, from the Wikignome to the Wikiholic. The project was designed to have a friendly and helpful environment to support any unfortunate Wikipedians that have become victims of incivility, hostility, or continual disrespect.
We currently need help in getting going, and making the community understand our aims. We work for civility. Nothing more, nothing less.
If you have ideas, let us know at our talk page, or on the IRC channel. We aim to spread civility in every way we can.
Should you wish to unsubscribe to future newsletters, please add your name to Wikipedia:Concordia/Do Not Spam.
Thank you for your time. If you need anything, feel free to comment at WT:CCD or come into our IRC channel [2].
- The Concordia council. Delivered by Ian13 13:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi Blnguyen, and thank you for your kind comments in my request for adminship! With a final tally of (109/5/1), I have been entrusted with adminship. It's been several weeks since the conclusion of the process, so hopefully you've had a chance to see me in action. Please let me know what you think! Thanks again, and I look forward to many more DYK contributions from you and to working with you as a fellow Admin! ++Lar: t/c 03:25, 28 May 2006 (UTC) | |
Adverts: Like The Beatles?... Like LEGO?... In a WikiProject that classifies?... Are you an accountable admin?... Got DYK?... |
Thanks for your comments and edit in eurovision. I have further updated it and left my reasons in the Eurovision talk page Satyricon uk 18:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Its a sign...
editIts a sign of things to come. ;-) DGX 04:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- And congrats! DGX 04:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
on Michael Phelps Religion
editIt doesn't have to be in the article, it probably isn't important to most people, I was just curious that's all. Jlaforteza
- I'm afraid I haven't a clue. Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 05:09, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
I think your new powers are in need! AIV is getting quite filled up. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 05:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello JChap2007. Unfortunately, advertising does not apply as a criteria for deleting material (usually businesses under {{db-group}} or similar templates, so I have had to replace your tags with {{prod}} as an advertisement. Not to worry, I did similar things when I was a newbie (See User talk:Blnguyen/Archive1) and I am now an administrator, who can process these requests, so I am equally happy to explain deletion procedure to others. Regards, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 05:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. --JChap 06:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Oops, did I recreate a talk page on a deleted article?
editI was editing Talk:Netball Rule in reply to the original editor when you (speedy) deleted the article in question. Was the Talk page meant to be deleted also (and I inadvertently recreated it), or did you mean for it to be left in place? Sorry if I'm doubling your clean-up work on that one. (And my compliments on being much speedier with that speedy delete than I expected!) —C.Fred (talk) 06:21, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
DB/Prod
editI didn't realize that A7 doesn't apply to podcasts. That's fine, thanks for catching it. Cheers, -Will Beback 07:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
The Original Chocolate Chip Cookie | ||
I hereby award Blnguyen this cookie for being a swell guy and a champion of the arrestingly obscure. -- MarkBuckles 07:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC) |
- Not sure where I first came across you - probably something to do with classical music since I spend most of time editing those articles. At some point I came across your legion of DYK's and other accomplishments and was quite impressed. Thought I'd throw a little wikilove your way. --MarkBuckles 07:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Category back
editAbdul Kalam is listed as an Indian Muslim as is Pataudi the cricketer .Parsis too have a category by religion, . Also when having Manmohan Singh as a Prime Minister is mentioned as assuaging the hurt feelings of Sikhs IN the article, then there is nothing wrong in the category too. Adding them back to the cricket bio's till consensus is reached, also request feedback is sought BEFORE removing something. Everyone in the world does not know that a turban = a sikh ( even if it were true- which it is not) and I thought wiki does look at being a resource for the world. Haphar 09:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
A vaguely Vietnamese-related AfD for your consideration
editMind taking a look at VNNTU and commenting on its AfD? There's a call by an anon for a Vietnamese-speaking editor, I'm not sure why. ;) Kimchi.sg 11:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
edit...for the vandalism reversion to my user page. Cheers. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 12:08, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Please note
editHi, I think you forgot to close the template on User:Lar 's talk page. I have closed the template as of now, but please check elsewhere you might have posted the template. Regards, --Andy123 candy? 14:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Football clubs
editHi! I'm sorry I didn't respond earlier to your inquiry about Australian football clubs. I haven't really formed an opinion on them - it depends on how large following they have, if they are notable historically (such as Larvik Turn & I.F.), if they have had notable players on their roster etc. When it comes to Australian clubs tough I reckon I am not familiar enough with the subject..
If you want to look at a low-level football club however, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guttæne FC (2nd nomination). Regards, Punkmorten 20:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
DYK
editUrgent Request
editDear Blnguyen,
I would like to bring something to your attention (the proposed deletion of a wikipedia article) and would like to request your help.
You probably remember the article India_Basher, you had plaved the PROD TAG on it.
I have seen some of your contributions, and I think with your international background (Vietnam), you might have a good understanding of the issues involved. Please look at current version of the article: India_Basher and views about its proposed deltion:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/India_Basher. I am hoping to save the article. My contribution to the article is relatively small, but I think it is a valuable article.
I believe that those supporting deletion of the article may have made a decision while the article was still in its beginning stages. With your knowledge of India (at least the movies) and its interaction with the world, you can probably make an informed decision about value of the article, and its accuracy. I will appreciate if you can share your thoughts at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/India_Basher.
You can my my contributions to Wikipedia at Special:Contributions/Vikramsingh --Vikramsingh 01:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Ron Sorensen - Speedy Delete
editThanks. - Reaverdrop (talk/nl/wp:space) 04:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- You're welcome.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Actually I missed a companion entry, for his album: Someday, Somehow. Care to do the honors, or should I go through listing this one too? - Reaverdrop (talk/nl/wp:space) 04:37, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, albums are not people, and cannot be speedied. Use {{prod}}. Thanks, Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
- Okay. Thanks again. - Reaverdrop (talk/nl/wp:space) 04:41, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Dear Blnguyen
editDear Blnguyen, I've taken the time to browse your contributions extensively and was thinking about adding a personal review to the page that you've wisely created in order to get feedback on yourself. However, I believe that in your case, the time for words is over, and it's the right moment to act instead. Therefore, I'd like to suggest you to apply for adminship without delay, and it would be both a pleasure and a privilege if you allow me to nominate you. I very seldom offer myself to nominate someone I've never directly interacted with before, but in your case I can clearly see that you're an asset to our community and a very nice person; to sum it up, exactly the kind of admins that we desperately need. We all believe you're ready. Please, if you wish to accept my proposition, just let me know; I'll be happy to proceed. Cheers, Phaedriel ♥ tell me - 17:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- I'll co-nominate based on your helpful presence at DYK. Please accept this opportunity. Kimchi.sg 17:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- Seems like Blnguyen's got a lot of support votes even before his RFA has begun! Anyway myself, User:I@n & User:Snottygobble too have been considering nominating him for some time now & have been corresponding through email. When I first considered nominating him on 25th April he told me he would like to wait for a month before accepting. So Blnguyen do you think you are ready now? Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 18:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. If User:Anwar saadat turns up & attcks your RFA (which I have no doubt he would), it will turn into a battle ground for the article Ajith rather than an RFA. Can you give me your email address (preferably gmail) so we can continue this correspondence there. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 01:38, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- I respect your decision to defer any nomination for later, but I must comment on your main reason for doing so. If User:Anwar saadat attacks you during the RfA, other voters have the perogative to dismiss his comments and concentrate on evaluting your contributions instead. Don't let him deter you from an RfA nom - let your contribs and your prior responses to him influence other, non-biased editors. I'm sure the RfA community will be excellent in weeding out any invalid opposes or attacks. Kimchi.sg 02:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- Do you want to update your remark here? :-) NoSeptember talk 14:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- Go for it, the time has come! --kingboyk 09:56, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- If/when you go for an RFA, somebody is likely to comment on your signature and the userboxes (though most of them seem to be valid). Please make sure that you have taken these into account before then. Tintin (talk) 01:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Let me clarify : I'll support you even if you had the old signature or if you had none at all ! But as you know there'll be some frivolous votes on the basis of it which we could do without. Ignore my comment about useboxes. I had only noticed that there are too many, but looking closer there are none which they call 'divisive'. Tintin (talk) 05:18, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Stop dilly-dallying around! Nominate yourself already! :p michael talk 04:06, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- Seems like Blnguyen's got a lot of support votes even before his RFA has begun! Anyway myself, User:I@n & User:Snottygobble too have been considering nominating him for some time now & have been corresponding through email. When I first considered nominating him on 25th April he told me he would like to wait for a month before accepting. So Blnguyen do you think you are ready now? Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 18:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Nomination for Adminship
editYour RFA
editThanks for your comments. I understand completely about writing esoteric or noncontroversial articles. I have a half a dozen myself where I am essentially the only contributor (Population Genetics is pretty lonely if you stay away from evolution. :)). I have learned immeasurably from the conflict that arose on Natural selection, even though I was not involved. There is a currently open arbitration case against one editor, based on essentially one or two other editors. On the other hand, I've been able to work with this same editor on Heritability with little trouble. I fully expect the editor who started the arbitration to be the subject of one eventually. It seems to be the nature of the business. Good luck with your administership. Just remember, one of the best tools to deal with "problem" editors is to hesitate before clicking Save page. Ted 05:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
I'd advise you not to link to your RfA from your user and user talk pages. Judging from past precedent, some people will vote 'oppose' based on the RfA link alone. Kimchi.sg 10:06, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Userspace RfA notice
editHeyo there! Just coming by to spread misery instead of cheer! :P Anyway, could you consider taking down the notice about your RfA? I, personally, don't care, but there are people on Wikipedia that believe such notices to be advertising, and will (mis)interpret that as a sign of immaturity. You don't have to take it down, and I'm not forcing you to, but just thought I'd bring that to your attention. Anyway, thanks and cheers! Master of Puppets That's hot. 10:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
You're doing great.
editJust to let you know you have 52 votes so far in your RFA. I supported you and it seems you should have no problem getting promoted. Keep uo the good work. Mostly Rainy 12:08, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Your signature
editHi,
I noticed that you haven't updated your signature and it still stays "Review me" while your Editor Review has been closed after you went to RFA. Regards, -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 19:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)