Yellowbirdproject

Image tagging for Image:Logo high.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo high.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Warning

Please, do not use Wikipedia to promote a website. Thank you. --Deenoe 22:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

You don't seem to get... You cant use Wikipedia to promote your project... Im sorry but it's un-notable to the encyclopedia.. --Deenoe 00:04, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not blank warnings or content from your userpage. --Deenoe 00:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Hello.

I have nominated your article Yellow Bird Project for Speedy Deletion because it is un-notable, clearly vanity (See mainly criterion A7 of Speedy Deletion criterions) and because Wikipedia is NOT an advertising service (See what Wikipedia is NOT. --Deenoe 23:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I am removing my warnings on second thought. I still personally think the yellowbird project is not notable enough to be mentionned on WP but I remove my rollbacks, to let an other wikipedian decide about it. Please accept my apologies. Lucasbfr 00:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm backing Deenoe on this. Sorry, nice project, but nobody has heard of it yet. If it starts getting independent press, celebrities start wearing them to the VMAs, etc. -- then we can have an article. Vanity in the name of a charity is still vanity, in Wikipedia terms. --Dhartung | Talk 01:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Exactly.. Hope you don't take it bad and that you will continue contributing to Wikipedia! --Deenoe 01:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)