Yogasun
In reply to an email for the benefit of reviewing admins:
I'm sorry, I reviewed your contributions and while it is possible that you are not a sockpuppet per se, you have acted on behalf of or in a manner indistinguishable from Sfacets and the block will remain since meatpuppetry is just as inapropriate as sockpuppetry. I refer you to the relevant policy: Wikipedia:Sock
You are, of course, welcome to contest that block on your userpage (which you can edit even if blocked) by placing a {{unblock}} template there. Another admin will then be able to review the situation. — Coren (talk)
In response to your further email.
editI'm sorry, but no. Per WP:SOCK: "A new user who engages in the same behavior as another user in the same context, and who appears to be editing Wikipedia solely for that purpose, shall be subject to the remedies applied to the user whose behavior they are joining."
Again, you are welcome to request an unblock review by another admin, but I will not unblock myself. — Coren (talk) 14:57, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Yogasun (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is not a sockpuppet account and I am not acting on behalf of any other user. I am making edits in good faith. Could an admin please review this - these accussation are completely false
Decline reason:
Your first edit was to a talk page to agree with Sfacets. You even state We've gone back and forth on this long enough even though it is your very first edit. Then you continue to edit in a manner akin to Sfacets. Sorry. Denied. — IrishGuy talk 03:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The review of this block lends no support to whether or not the user is a sock. There is no valid reason to assert that this user is my sockpuppet, any simple checkuser will attest to this. Agreeing to my edits is not evidence that this account is linked to mine. Sfacets 05:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)