Yokubjon Juraev

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Pbritti (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Super Ψ Dro 14:23, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mamluk Sultanate. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 04:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello Yokubjon Juraev! Your additions to Old Turkic have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 05:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Revert

Could you stop reverting me? You're adding back a link to an article that does not exist. The "Romanian Tatar language" does not exist. Super Ψ Dro 19:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mirza Muhammad Haidar Dughlat, you may be blocked from editing. Qiushufang (talk) 04:04, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Mirza Muhammad Haidar Dughlat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Qiushufang (talk) 05:19, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Qiushufang (talk) 05:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Yokubjon Juraev! Your additions to Turkic languages have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 19:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I have understood you, so I will paraphrase and publish it. Yokubjon Juraev (talk) 19:07, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tumed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ömnögovi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Please stop POVPUSH in name changing and order

Please stop name changing names in Hami and Kara Del. Hami is the WP:COMMONNAME, official name, as well as native name of the city. It is transcribed from Mongolian, not Uyghur. And both the Uyghur and Chinese names are "native names". Qiushufang (talk) 20:47, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Old South Arabian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canaanite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Stop edit warring and read the article talk page

Hi! I see that you've previously engaged in edit warring and have been blocked for doing so. Stop edit warring on the Uzbek language article and read and respond to my comment in the talk page of the article. Nataev ^talk 15:35, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi! Ok, I will stop edit warring. I was just furious at your deleting those bits of info without discussion! But ok, I will stop. Yokubjon Juraev (talk) 16:18, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

You cannot be "furious" but have to assume good faith on Wikipedia. If you cannot cite sources to support your claims, refrain from reverting my edits on the article. If you can provide reliable sources, you can restore the material. Keep in mind that the lead section should be a summary of the article. In other words, you should first cover the issue in the main body of the article. Nataev ^talk 16:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Edits to Turkic languages

Hello! A couple of quick things: thank you for your edits, but please remember to use edit summaries. Also, I've reverted some of your mentions of transeurasian languages as it's basically an extremely minority theory without much wide support, though it is mentioned elsewhere in the article. I didn't revert all your edits, as some seem good, but please remember to cite statements you make in articles.

Again, thanks. Warrenmck (talk) 02:04, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello. By “cite statements” do you mean providing sources? Yokubjon Juraev (talk) 22:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

I don’t know when I mentioned Altaic/Transeurasian hypothesis. If you mean the book “A guide to Transeurasian languages” then the term Transeurasian is not used in the sense of “Altaic family” in the book. Please understand what you are doing. Yokubjon Juraev (talk) 22:56, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

You're partially correct, The Oxford Guide to the Transeurasian Languages is actually a good scholarly source for some of the background details but it is in part specifically about the Transeurasian hypothesis, and therefore needs to be handled very carefully. You have, as far as I could tell from reading the source materials, added in material linking the genetics of Turkic and Mongolian languages beyond just contact features, which I've since removed from the article. A lot of your edits to wikipedia, such as changing the language name of Karakhanid from the WP:COMMONNAME and changing references to Xinziang to "East Tajikistan" shouldn't be happening here. You've made a lot of low quality edits and have already been temporarily banned for edit warring. I encourage you to familiarize yourself with the foundational rules of wikipedia more before continuing to edit in this way.

Also, please remember to use edit summaries. Warrenmck (talk) 23:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Warrenmck (talk) 20:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

I am ok if you remove unsourced content but you evidently removed sourced ones as well. Yokubjon Juraev (talk) 07:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

The sourced content you're adding doesn't always contain the same claim you're adding in, particularly because you appear to be heavily editorializing claims relating to cognates to be stronger than they claim in the original text. Beyond that, there's issues with WP:EXCESSDETAIL.

While I would like us to work together to improve the article, as I see you as attempting to edit in good faith, nobody needs you to be okay with edits to an article in order to make those changes; you don't own the article and you've routinely run up against 3RR issues when trying to maintain articles like this. If you don't like the changes I make to an article, then let's take it to the article's talk page, but you need to be more careful with your sources and be careful not attempt to exert ownership over articles. See, for example, the recent removal of a cited statement on Uralic and Turkic vowel harmony I just removed from the Turkic Languages article; the source page emphatically did not make the same statement that you'd cited. A version of it, yes, but a general "In theory, this may explain it if it's real" was simply paraphrased as a factual event. If other editors are removing sources you add after reading them, don't simply revert, but discuss. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 02:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

331dot (talk) 09:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)