You know I am saying truth
August 2011
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Foreign policy of the United States, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Foreign policy of the United States was changed by You know I am saying truth (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874884 on 2011-08-25T10:05:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:05, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Foreign policy of the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 10:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. I might add that you are not helping your case by repeatedly removing your name from the report. Yunshui (talk) 10:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
You know I am saying truth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
New to wikipedia. Got frustrated by seeing no criticism against USA who are doing so much damage to humanity. So I thought I would contribute to the page. You know I am saying truth (talk) 10:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is an encyclopedia of knowledge that is supported by third party reliabel sources, and not one that allows original research or even the WP:TRUTH. All articles/commentary must follow the neutral point of view. You're not allowed to include personal critique - and of course, based on the long term fiscal issues in the US, your critique is flawed anyway. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:52, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.