My talk page
editthis is my talk page Yucky Cupid (talk) 23:07, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
WP:RS
editBecause a source is not listed at WP:ICTFFAQ does NOT mean it is not RS. It just means it hasn't been added yet. Have you read enough Puthiya Thalaimurai articles? Did you uncover any evidence of malpractice, errors or corruption in them? Then you could take this to WP:Perennial sources. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed. But then how did you come to the conclusion that it IS a reliable source ? I only said this would require a new discussion at the Indian cinema WikiProject talk page.
- (Yucky Cupid (talk) 09:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC))
- @Yucky Cupid: Print media is generally considered reliable per WP:NFSOURCES, be it in any language. If you need then you can open a new discussion at the WT:ICTF. NaanReady (talk) 13:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Although I might be wrong, your objective in this case seems a little shady; you have a song from Vijay's new film as your username. Since you added this source to Beast, you should start the discussion. This source is not used in any other major article. While the source may or may not be notable, it wouldn't harm to ask for the opinion of others at the WikiProject page. If this movie Beast did gross 300 crore, then there would be mention in other reliable sources about it.
- (Yucky Cupid (talk) 18:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC))
- @Yucky Cupid: Print media is generally considered reliable per WP:NFSOURCES, be it in any language. If you need then you can open a new discussion at the WT:ICTF. NaanReady (talk) 13:51, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Ponyobons mots 18:29, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.